killzone 2

Post by **Bonn-o-Tron** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:34 pm

warman45 wrote:i don't think halo 3 will be ported for some time cause it will crash computers

Uh...what?

Post by **razgriz 25th inf.** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:44 pm

halo 3's graphics are so well that normal computers with most of their RAM used up and running on the the slow-butt CPU, they go really slow and the high byte rating of halo 3 would halt it altogether. u can thank my dad, a computer engineer, 4 that info.

Post by **birdman** » Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:43 pm

that's an interesting adjective you used there.
but you do have a point. however, i would say that computers that can run crysis could run halo 3.

Post by **IVhorseman** » Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:31 pm

Honestly, Halo 3's graphics aren't even that well. They're well, but there's much better that runs on PCs.

Post by **ahp77** » Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:26 pm

razgriz 25th inf. wrote:halo 3's graphics are so well that normal computers with most of their RAM used up and running on the the slow-butt CPU, they go really slow and the high byte rating of halo 3 would halt it altogether. u can thank my dad, a computer engineer, 4 that info.

How much RAM, do you think?

Post by **Bonn-o-Tron** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:12 pm

razgriz 25th inf. wrote:halo 3's graphics are so well that normal computers with most of their RAM used up and running on the the slow-butt CPU, they go really slow and the high byte rating of halo 3 would halt it altogether. u can thank my dad, a computer engineer, 4 that info.

Normal is the operative word there. Assuming that normal means a typical, default, store-bought computer, most "normal" computers can't run a lot of games very well. Now, I've never juxtaposed Halo 3 with Crysis, but I imagine that if I did, Crysis's graphics would surpass Halo 3's, and there may be other games out there that could as well.

In a nutshell, I highly doubt Halo 3 is a computer-breaking game.

Post by **Massam** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:36 am

It isn't....far cry 2 is better, and my computer could handle it. Projict origin is better, and I could handle it. Personally, I don't like the Halo 3 graphics...they're kinda...cartoony?

Oh, and I only have a 1.7 ghz dual core...kinda crappy processor now.

Post by **james+burgundy** » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:40 am

well there is no reson to post this other then there are no kill zone 2 pics and i relly wanted to see some so now i can see some

Post by **pesgores** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:33 am

Impressive.

Post by **IVhorseman** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:27 pm

Yeah, from a purely graphical perspective, Killzone 2 looks insanely, retardedly good.

Also, the multiplayer classes rule.

Post by **Bonn-o-Tron** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:54 pm

Hell yeah.
It sucks though, that you have to play multiplayer a hell of a lot in order to unlock the better classes. I can't remember, but I don't think I've unlocked any of them yet.

Post by **razgriz 25th inf.** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:35 pm

yeah, I've benn playing killzone 2 for 2 weeks and i STILL have no new weapons. no i am NOT a noob. i have perfected the way to pwn all. ROFL
but u know what saddened me? i never saw killzone 1, but i thought that there SHOULD ahve been a grenade launcher on the ISA rifle

Post by **IVhorseman** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:14 pm

^^^ There used to be and it ruled, but not as hard as a shotgun on the STA-52

Are you sure your stats are saving? you don't need all that many points to grab a shotgun or an SMG. 2 weeks should definitely be there.

Currently, I've unlocked Medic (full) Mechanic (half) Tactician, and soldier (full). Fortunately, only a few more ranks till Saboteur!

The BrikWars Forums

killzone 2

is killzone 2 good?