A Challenge:

[Ross_Varn]

Describe what the hell you're talking about via politics, Piltogg. In three sentences.

[piltogg]

the politics part? ok.

1. The vast majority of the world's resources are currently controlled by a few thousand extremely rich dynastic families who run giant corporations. (many of whom are Jewish)

2. The Illuminati would prefer to have the world ruled by the experts of the working class rather than people who just inherited their wealth and thus power by being born.

3. The reason that they, and I would prefer the world to be that way, is an exceedingly esoteric and religious one, which I have no hope of explaining in one sentence.

[stubby]

1. The vast majority of the world's resources are currently controlled by a few thousand extremely rich dynastic families who run giant corporations. (many of whom are Jewish)

This sounds like bullshit but weirdly it turns out to be true. Except the Jewish part is dumb, because you can stick a whole bunch of different groups in there and it's still true - "many of whom are Chinese," "many of whom are Arabs," etc.

Anyway back to my point. We finally got computers and network analysis algorithms powerful enough to start connecting the dots. And the resulting map is much tighter-knit than you'd expect.

http://planetsave.com/2011/08/28/who-ru ... e-control/

In Piltogg's defense, Barclays is run by the Rothschild dynasty and has the #1 spot. But this isn't a list of Jewish companies, it's a list of finance and holding companies. The real problem is that we're letting the finance guys own everything.

[piltogg]

Yeah, it's not only Jewish people... there are simply are disproportional number of them. That and Goldman-Sachs specifically is a pretty big problem.

[Silverdream]

I for one welcome our Jewish overlords.

[Tzan]

"many of whom are computer nerds"

[Ham701]

Illuminati=Communists. When you take away the rich, you just make a new set of rich to replace them.

[Ross_Varn]

Thanks mate. Just wondering what your beef with the US was.

[stubby]

Yeah, it's not only Jewish people... there are simply are disproportional number of them. That and Goldman-Sachs specifically is a pretty big problem.

The same is true of chess. Ashkenazi Jews (which are really the genetic subset of Jews that's important to this conversation) make up less than a quarter of a percent of the population of the world, and yet they make up more than half of the world's chess champions. That's a disproportion of more than TWENTY THOUSAND PERCENT. It's an impossible number! By gum there must be a massive worldwide conspiracy by the Jews to take over chess! The only hole in my theory is that it would be completely retarded!

In fact, the real explanation is simple: according to every test of intelligence in the realms of abstract strategy and logic, Ashkenazi Jews are a full standard deviation smarter than the general population in those two areas. (Spatial performance averages a deviation below, if it makes you feel any better.) This has held true for as long as there's been intelligence testing, and it holds true at ages before factors of wealth or education come strongly into play. And in a championship where you're pitting guys against each other one by one to winnow the population down to only the best individual, the population that's ten percent better on average has a huge advantage. As you push that 10% advantage through successive generations, it turns into (as seen) a twenty thousand percent advantage in terms of the likelihood of one of their number reaching the number one spot.

Banking is a similar game, in which thousands and thousands of players are competing for the "championship" of moving up the ladders and getting positions at the biggest and most powerful banks in the world. All the mechanics and percentages run similar to the chess games earlier. If you're a top bank and you're focused on grabbing up only the very best candidate in the world, the chances at any given time that the best candidate available is an Ashkenazi Jew are similar to the chances that the best chess player in the world is an Ashkenazi Jew. Which is to say, probably better than 50% odds.

Is it possible that there's some conspiracy out there, where the most powerful banks in the world would pass up a higher-performing Gentile candidate to hire a lower-performing Jewish one? Sure, but they wouldn't stay the most powerful for long. Banking is too cutthroat to give up that kind of advantage and not end up paying for it.

The reason finance has a disproportionate number of Jews in the top echelon is because they're disproportionally the best candidates for those jobs. It's the effect of a pure meritocracy, just like the kind you keep shouting that we need.

The problem isn't that Jews have some inappropriately terrible power in the world of finance, the real problem is that finance has inappropriately terrible power in the world of the world.

[Cpt. Zipps]

Yeah, it's not only Jewish people... there are simply are disproportional number of them. That and Goldman-Sachs specifically is a pretty big problem.

The same is true of chess. Ashkenazi Jews (which are really the genetic subset of Jews that's important to this conversation) make up less than a quarter of a percent of the population of the world, and yet they make up more than half of the world's chess champions. That's a disproportion of more than TWENTY THOUSAND PERCENT. It's an impossible number! By gum there must be a massive worldwide conspiracy by the Jews to take over chess! The only hole in my theory is that it would be completely retarded!

In fact, the real explanation is simple: according to every test of intelligence in the realms of abstract strategy and logic, Ashkenazi Jews are a full standard deviation smarter than the general population in those two areas. (Spatial performance averages a deviation below, if it makes you feel any better.) This has held true for as long as there's been intelligence testing, and it holds true at ages before factors of wealth or education come strongly into play. And in a championship where you're pitting guys against each other one by one to winnow the population down to only the best individual, the population that's ten percent better on average has a huge advantage. As you push that 10% advantage through successive generations, it turns into (as seen) a twenty thousand percent advantage in terms of the likelihood of one of their number reaching the number one spot.

Banking is a similar game, in which thousands and thousands of players are competing for the "championship" of moving up the ladders and getting positions at the biggest and most powerful banks in the world. All the mechanics and percentages run similar to the chess games earlier. If you're a top bank and you're focused on grabbing up only the very best candidate in the world, the chances at any given time that the best candidate available is an Ashkenazi Jew are similar to the chances that the best chess player in the world is an Ashkenazi Jew. Which is to say, probably better than 50% odds.

Is it possible that there's some conspiracy out there, where the most powerful banks in the world would pass up a higher-performing Gentile candidate to hire a lower-performing Jewish one? Sure, but they wouldn't stay the most powerful for long. Banking is too cutthroat to give up that kind of advantage and not end up paying for it.

The reason finance has a disproportionate number of Jews in the top echelon is because they're disproportionally the best candidates for those jobs. It's the effect of a pure meritocracy, just like the kind you keep shouting that we need.

The problem isn't that Jews have some inappropriately terrible power in the world of finance, the real problem is that finance has inappropriately terrible power in the world of the world.

This is perfectly said. From a first hand perspective, in slightly less eloquent terms: People have been fucking with us for centuries. Instead of fighting back violently, we became nerds and just sucked it up when we could. The stereotype that we're bad at sports and read a lot? It's 100% true. Both of my parents are lawyers. My cousin is one of the top physicists in the world. It's just how we roll. Saying that we rule the banking world is pretty true, the same with hollywood, but you could say the same thing about Christians ruling the sports world.


In short: Let us have this thing, We do it well and people aren't trying to kill us now.

[OneEye589]

80% of NBA basketball players are black. What's the deal?

[Zupponn]

80% of NBA basketball players are black. What's the deal?

The Jewish hire them to play because the Jewish are naturally bad at sports.

[piltogg]

hahaha.. well I don't really care about it all that much. I just needed to have some form of justification for including piltoggism in this whole mess and that was the only place where it seemed to fit in with those three sentences in particular.

And no, it's not communism. It's sort of like the middle ground between capitalism and Communism. Because it's still capitalism, just restricted so that greedy people aren't able to screw over everyone else. And then it's also sort of a democracy, but restricted so that people who don't know anything about what they are voting on are not allowed to vote. But people who are experts in the field they are voting on can have multiple votes. This way, our democracy gets us to smart decisions rather than idiotic propaganda fueled ones.

[Zupponn]

But people who are experts in the field they are voting on can have multiple votes. This way, our democracy gets us to smart decisions rather than idiotic propaganda fueled ones.

That still doesn't mean that those so-called "experts" aren't idiots.

[piltogg]

well... they have to pass a test to get those votes. So they might still be idiots, but at least they know things and therefore will be able to make an informed decision.