The 2,017 Blarney Build

Show off your armies and weaponry and stuff.

Moderators: Zahru II, Natalya

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Quantumsurfer » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:26 am

Not sure I see the irony.  Sure, we have a few elitists here who like to tell folks what they are and aren't allowed to do but, I mean, most of us just ignore them don't we?

In reference to my further comments, I suppose I could see that, turning around and telling someone to go "read the rules."  But, then, it was a suggestion to clear up confusion and they aren't rules at all...just a collection of ideas that can be dismissed out of hand if one so desires.

Maybe in reference to contrarians being contrary to themselves and other contrarians?  That would make the most sense, I'd guess.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Cakeman » Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:56 am

Oh the irony was all aimed at myself - i corrected a spelling to a misspelling, according to a rule about us not caring to proper spelling or elitist views when I in the same post had expressed such views by correcting in the first place.

I was just trying to be funny at my own expense :-)
User avatar
Cakeman
Nice TRIPS
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:47 am
Location: Sweden

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby RedRover » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:10 pm

submission for drunken madness! Alcohol of choice included!
User avatar
RedRover
I want you to be
I want you to be
 
Posts: 2197
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:36 pm
Location: Desert

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Quantumsurfer » Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:27 pm

Cakeman wrote:I was just trying to be funny at my own expense


oic

RedRover wrote:submission for drunken madness! Alcohol of choice included!


I was wondering when someone would get round to doing one of these.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Vami IV » Sat Mar 18, 2017 5:16 am

Tzan wrote:"K" is more metal and brutal.
Metal is the music of the Brikverse.

how metal is the kkk

k = 69 ?


:666:
User avatar
Vami IV
blah blah swastikas kkk look how edgy I am
blah blah swastikas kkk look how edgy I am
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:43 pm
Location: ✠1095✠1189✠1209✠1230✠

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Captain-Camper » Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:05 pm

18
User avatar
Captain-Camper
seriously?
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:17 am
Location: Here and There Along the Echo

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Quantumsurfer » Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:59 am

Math errors are so common.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Tzan » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:34 am

So the most evil faction would be:

"Faction 18"
User avatar
Tzan
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
 
Posts: 4139
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Quantumsurfer » Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:02 am

Most Evil.  But also Dumbest.
Attachments
Faction 18 Grand DoucheNozzle.lxf
(16.5 KiB) Downloaded 11 times
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Vami IV » Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:52 pm

Quantumsurfer wrote:Most Evil.  But also Dumbest.

Image
Haha, I couldn't not post this. My favorite is the one on the right because that goof looks like the obese women from Dark Souls III

Publisher's edit: I now know that those enemies are called "Cathedral Evangelists" which honestly totally fits the theme here.
User avatar
Vami IV
blah blah swastikas kkk look how edgy I am
blah blah swastikas kkk look how edgy I am
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:43 pm
Location: ✠1095✠1189✠1209✠1230✠

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby militaryfreak » Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:10 am

I understand you specified an "original build" is a largely upgraded version of a previously posted build sufficient for entry?
TROLOLO
militaryfreak
Hero
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:49 am
Location: A Military Base

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby RedRover » Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:00 am

militaryfreak wrote:I understand you specified an "original build" is a largely upgraded version of a previously posted build sufficient for entry?


I think so!
User avatar
RedRover
I want you to be
I want you to be
 
Posts: 2197
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:36 pm
Location: Desert

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Quantumsurfer » Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:33 pm

Yeah, I don't see a problem with that.  I think we had one of those last year.  Significant changes to your previous build qualifies as a new build in my mind.  I'd prefer entries not be reposts of your older material but when I specified "original build," I am instead referring to not copying someone elses MOC.  Borrowing ideas is fine, obviously, but not a brick for brick recreation of something you saw on Flickr or whatever.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby Quantumsurfer » Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:57 pm

A little under a week remains.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build

Postby AnnoyedZebra » Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:44 pm

Can I have an extension of a few days? I've built something and need to take pics
User avatar
AnnoyedZebra
Somebody make this Zebra's rank.
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:46 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Armoury

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests