well i thought about insulting it in a nice lofty way that took up many many words that most of the members here have never used before but then i sort of got lazy and had to eat dinner so i just did this crappy post next time i might give my insults more effortAlmighty Benny wrote:I liked you better when you were unintelligible, j+b
MattL wrote:Although the model is based on 40k, are the names based on Command & Conquer?
Funky Weasel wrote:Those are the nuts! I am a big fan of the extraneous tubing on Mr Blue. My only structural concern is that the legs look like weak points - enemy snipers might easily cripple these fine war machines by concentrating fire and blowing a leg off.
Potentially avoidable by building shin-armour onto the legs or projecting up from the feet, but risks obscuring the nice mechanical detailing.
james+burgundy wrote:wow that is like crap it pains me to even point my eyes toward the images. It is a insult to 40k you should be ashamed
Gunney wrote:I say, they are a noble and solid construction, but the firepower is lacking. Over Shoulder cannons/gatlings would satisfy me.
Tiny Tank Rannon wrote:Unless I'm missing something, isn't the total amount of weapon size you can use just double your creation size?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Zahru II and 4 guests