The P-69 Recon Hovercraft

Post by **AdrianTheGeek** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:15 am

I decided that the best way to start 2010 was with a new MOC. This is actually my first MOC with the SNOT technique. Hope you guys enjoy it.

General view.

Rear view.

Rear view with the hatch down. Which is how j+b likes it.

Bottom view.

Side view.

Happy 2010!

Post by **The Shadowscythe** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:04 am

I'm gonna do you're mother sideways, without the loob . . . in the wrong hole. /Vote cast

Also, very nice hovercraft gotta say that I love the front gun, and the underside - very nice indeed. Would it be possible to have another version? without the rear door and troop capacity - with some form of mounted turret for extra dakka? 'cause i gotta say I love the dakka!

Post by **Warhead** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:28 am

Hey! That there's my patter yah bugger!

This is really nice Adrianthegeek. Make a few more and a big one with tank turret like Rok's. Also, the curved parts on the side and the way they end at the back, they look very cool. Nice gun too.

My terrible youtube channel · Post by **Magic Soap** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:02 am

Two Problems:

6. It's still not fully SNOT, as it was built with a plate up. The only reason it is SNOT is you've just used flat panels and slopes
7.

That looks like an illegal join.

Post by **Warhead** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:16 am

7. That looks like an illegal join.

Well, that's a new one. An illegal Join? Let me see, referencing, please hold....

Ah, here it is. It quite clearly states in the big book of ultimate rules in page 2109 in paragraph 12/a sub-rule 11:3:57e that your talking from your rectum.

Post by **Tuefish** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:35 am

Looks Awesome, Like a flying bathtub of death...

...Hmmm, flying bathtub of death...

...Oh, where was I? oh yeah, good work.

My terrible youtube channel · Post by **Magic Soap** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:46 am

Warhead wrote:
7. That looks like an illegal join.
Well, that's a new one. An illegal Join? Let me see, referencing, please hold....

Ah, here it is. It quite clearly states in the big book of ultimate rules in page 2109 in paragraph 12/a sub-rule 11:3:57e that your talking from your rectum.

If Briks do not correctly match up, or stress is applied to a component, then it is known as an illegal Join/Joint.

http://www.brothers-brick.com/lego-glossary/#Illegal

Post by **Warhead** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:00 am

Whoa! Busted by the fuzz.

New Years resolution?

Post by **OneEye589** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:58 am

6. Slopes still count as studs on top. It's SNOT because of the sides, the back, and the gun.

7. It's not an illegal joint. It works.

Post by **Nitewatchman** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:55 pm

Nitewatchman likes this.

Post by **IVhorseman** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:17 pm

what good is a lego creation if you can't break a rule every now and then? Nice work.

Post by **james+burgundy** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:24 pm

wow its stubby been a lot time since I have seen a stubby hovercraft.

My terrible youtube channel · Post by **Magic Soap** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:24 pm

OneEye589 wrote:6. Slopes still count as studs on top. It's SNOT because of the sides, the back, and the gun.

7. It's not an illegal joint. It works.

I don't really care, it's still good.

Post by **OneEye589** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:15 pm

Just sayin'.

Post by **Natalya** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:19 pm

I like turtles.

The BrikWars Forums

The P-69 Recon Hovercraft

Should I make another one?

The P-69 Recon Hovercraft