Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:22 pm
his butthurts because he senses his future in that region of his body, if you know what i mean. *10 seconds later* im saying you want to buttfuck warhead.
That's exactly why I'm a butter side up sort of guy. This ring was made for outgoings, not incumings.subyrally wrote:don't feel booty botheredWarhead wrote:They all say that...
Yeah, I don't think so. I have you outgunned by around 3 to 1 in space, in the air my fighters are mostly swarmers but I have 8 of them plus a stealth fighter and gunship so I will hold the air and I outnumber your armor by more than 3 to 1. The only place where your troops outnumber me is infantry and they don't last too long, plus my hardsuits will rip giant holes in your infantry.beluga wrote:
If I come, you (minus HATREDCOPTER) are all doomed to absolute annihilation!!!!!!
Rev. Sylvanus wrote:It is more than funny to me that this sudden wanker-measuring contest was started by two pre-adolescents with some of the more visually unpleasing MOC's and armies on the boards. I mean no distinct offense to you two, but needless bragging turns me off, so I'm jumping in.
Fellas, let's get this straight. You can show up to as many battles as you want with a massive fistful of rainbow crap and blocky-as-hell wheeled contraptions and say that your ZOMG ROXOR Mutha-Fukin army is better than everyone elses. But the BEST forces at all of those games are the ones that are visually stunning and brick-tastic. I would much rather see a force of less than 20 guys with a handful of ossum, well-built, fun-to-look at vehicles than a billion baseplates of haphazard brick-shame. Let's try some humility?
That is all,
Rev.
now lets get this straight. i can't believe im speaking in pedos defence here, but in my opinion, his MOC's are rather well put together. he just doesn't have numbers in you guys numbers because he, like me has not enough briks. he want perfection, instead of a large army. like i said the reason i don't have such an army is because i don't have the briks nor patience to hunt down every last grey brik to build something. besides, i like to think once you get past the haphazardly put together 137th troops, that my Rangers, Power armored troops, spartans, etc, my infantry looks pretty damn nice. besides, even then, i have a decent group of non rainbow planes and ground vehicles. the premise is that you would have to admire how is built and what it would like if i had all of the briks i could want.Rev. Sylvanus wrote:It is more than funny to me that this sudden wanker-measuring contest was started by two pre-adolescents with some of the more visually unpleasing MOC's and armies on the boards. I mean no distinct offense to you two, but needless bragging turns me off, so I'm jumping in.
Fellas, let's get this straight. You can show up to as many battles as you want with a massive fistful of rainbow crap and blocky-as-hell wheeled contraptions and say that your ZOMG ROXOR Mutha-Fukin army is better than everyone elses. But the BEST forces at all of those games are the ones that are visually stunning and brick-tastic. I would much rather see a force of less than 20 guys with a handful of ossum, well-built, fun-to-look at vehicles than a billion baseplates of haphazard brick-shame. Let's try some humility?
That is all,
Rev.
secondedrazgriz 25th inf. wrote: now lets get this straight. I can't believe im speaking in pedos defence here, but in my opinion, his MOC's are rather well put together. he just doesn't have numbers in you guys numbers because he, like me has not enough briks. he want perfection, instead of a large army. like I said the reason I don't have such an army is because I don't have the briks nor patience to hunt down every last grey brik to build something. besides, I like to think once you get past the haphazardly put together 137th troops, that my Rangers, Power armored troops, spartans, etc, my infantry looks pretty damn nice. besides, even then, I have a decent group of non rainbow planes and ground vehicles. the premise is that you would have to admire how is built and what it would like if I had all of the briks I could want.
Let me see if I can wade through the bad grammar. What I'm speaking against--please go reread my post--is the sudden wanker measuring contest that has risen up on these last couple of pages. Talk to Warhead, Natalya, ROC, and other MOC greats on this forum if you want to brag about force size and capability. Are Beluga's MOC's bad? No; just mostly unoriginal as is being discussed in another post. Are yours bad? Not all of them. They are also not spectacular enough for the ZOMG-I've-Got-the-kickassest-army-of-this-notyet-planned-battle-pride that annoyingly dripping from these posts. Hell, my own forces are low one that spectacular pole too. BUT, if you think you have a right to brag, make a Hatredcopter or a Venus Destroyer first; or at least get your crap nicelier contoured, less busy, etc. etc.razgriz 25th inf. wrote: now lets get this straight. I can't believe im speaking in pedos defence here, but in my opinion, his MOC's are rather well put together. he just doesn't have numbers in you guys numbers because he, like me has not enough briks. he want perfection, instead of a large army. like I said the reason I don't have such an army is because I don't have the briks nor patience to hunt down every last grey brik to build something. besides, I like to think once you get past the haphazardly put together 137th troops, that my Rangers, Power armored troops, spartans, etc, my infantry looks pretty damn nice. besides, even then, I have a decent group of non rainbow planes and ground vehicles. the premise is that you would have to admire how is built and what it would like if I had all of the briks I could want.
Have to point out that shoot one explosive on the white plane thing, and it chain reactions the hell out of everything.beluga wrote:
If I come, you (minus HATREDCOPTER) are all doomed to absolute annihilation!!!!!!
Well for one, I think pedo, suby, and myself agree that what you cal a "wanker measuring contest" is simply a joke. A JOKE. So, in summary: And since when were you obligated to care? Cause your a douchebag Oh, and how do you like me capitalizing? Assfloss.Rev. Sylvanus wrote:Let me see if I can wade through the bad grammar. What I'm speaking against--please go reread my post--is the sudden wanker measuring contest that has risen up on these last couple of pages. Talk to Warhead, Natalya, ROC, and other MOC greats on this forum if you want to brag about force size and capability. Are Beluga's MOC's bad? No; just mostly unoriginal as is being discussed in another post. Are yours bad? Not all of them. They are also not spectacular enough for the ZOMG-I've-Got-the-kickassest-army-of-this-notyet-planned-battle-pride that annoyingly dripping from these posts. Hell, my own forces are low one that spectacular pole too. BUT, if you think you have a right to brag, make a Hatredcopter or a Venus Destroyer first; or at least get your crap nicelier contoured, less busy, etc. etc.razgriz 25th inf. wrote: now lets get this straight. I can't believe im speaking in pedos defence here, but in my opinion, his MOC's are rather well put together. he just doesn't have numbers in you guys numbers because he, like me has not enough briks. he want perfection, instead of a large army. like I said the reason I don't have such an army is because I don't have the briks nor patience to hunt down every last grey brik to build something. besides, I like to think once you get past the haphazardly put together 137th troops, that my Rangers, Power armored troops, spartans, etc, my infantry looks pretty damn nice. besides, even then, I have a decent group of non rainbow planes and ground vehicles. the premise is that you would have to admire how is built and what it would like if I had all of the briks I could want.
Once again, I'm criticizing general disposition here and attitude, not building skill. If you don't have an infinite supply of bricks, great. But if your collection is "humble," then your army is also necessarily humble. Put your wankers back where they belong.
Rev.