BW 2010 feedback

Rules questions, suggestions, and discussion

Moderators: IVhorseman, Pwnerade

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:01 pm

bann154 wrote:A quick question. With piercing damage would it affect minfigures inside vehicles? So go through one wall of say a tank go through the crew compartment possibly killing the crew?

Yes. That's one of the main ideas behind Armor Piercing - that you could have a round that spends some d6es punching through the outer shell and then triggering an Explosion in the interior. The trick is having the right amount of Armor Piercing - too little won't punch through, too much will punch through the whole thing without triggering the Explosion at all.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby bann154 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:04 am

Im just curious why is the downside for inaccurate "Use as if 2 Sizes larger". To me this seems a bit much but just curious to hear the real justification?
My Factions/My Battles/My Painting and Modelling Adventures
A mind without purpose will wander in dark places
User avatar
bann154
bann is the mann
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:06 am
Location: Canada Eh?

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby TheVengefulOne » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:38 am

bann154 wrote:"Use as if 2 Sizes larger".


:twss:
I sexually identify as an attack helicopter and my religion is Def Leppard.
User avatar
TheVengefulOne
there are no brakes on the ban train
 
Posts: 572
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 1:46 pm
Location: The 666th Circle of Hell

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Wed Feb 15, 2017 10:37 am

bann154 wrote:Im just curious why is the downside for inaccurate "Use as if 2 Sizes larger". To me this seems a bit much but just curious to hear the real justification?

Setting Use to 1 size larger turned out to be unbalanced, with results like +1 Use for another die of damage. It made modified weapons more effective than basic weapons, which is something I want to avoid. The numbers started lining up again at +2 sizes.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby dilanski » Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:32 am

I've done a quick damage breakdown of custom weapons for anyone interested in how the ammunition type changes damage output. I was interested in seeing how the average roll and critical chance affect the end damage output.

Image

"AR+1C Weighted 1d10" is the column of interest here. It tells you the average roll when considering the potential bonus damage from a single critical once the dice has been weighted against a d10. I am surprised at how well d6's are doing, and wish I could ditch the armour piercing effect and just deal the d6's as damage. Phasic looks pretty bad at larger sizes, it would only need to go up against a small amount of shielding for it to make up for its lower damage, but exactly how often you are going to find targets with heavy shielding is another matter. Overall I was actually expecting a much greater variance in damage, however the math means that the smaller dice, the much greater the difference. If d4's got criticals, the damage for them would be insane, at about 8.44(!) damage weighted against the d10.
User avatar
dilanski
Now with added tractor fetish
 
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:41 am
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & Subjugated Ireland

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:54 am

What's the math behind AR+1C Weighted 1d10? I can follow you up to that point, but once you hit that column I can't tell where your numbers are coming from.

As a side note, the average roll on a d6 is 4.2 when recursive Bonus Dice are taken into account. Average rolls for all dice are listed in MC.2: http://brikwars.com/rules/2010/mc.htm#2

Spoiler: show
avg(dx) = ½(1+x) + (1/x)(avg(dx))

--> avg(dx) = (x+x²)/(2x-2) = (½x)(x+1)/(x-1)

--> avg(d6) = 4.2
User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:26 am

Wait, I get it now. "Weighted against d10" means a perfect conversion between dice, so you're rolling two and a half d4s for a d10, which isn't really allowed in the normal rules. But if you're house-ruling in perfect dice-to-dice conversions, then including recursive bonus rolls, your numbers will look like this:

    AR+1C Weighted 1d10
    :d4: 8.33 (d4s roll bonus d4s)
    :d6: 7
    :d8: 6.28
    :d10: 5.92
    :d12: 5.71

Now the d4s look like the clear winner. But the numbers start to tighten up again when you incorporate Overskill:

    Standard minifig
    :d4: 8.88 (fire)
    :d6: 7.7 (AP)
    :d8: 7.12 (-distance)
    :d10: 6.91 (+2" radius on 1/6th of rolls)
    :d12:  6.852 (phasing)

    Hero
    :d4: 9.995 (fire)
    :d6: 9.1 (AP)
    :d8: 8.79 (-distance)
    :d10: 8.88 (+2" radius on 1/2 of rolls)
    :d12: 9.135 (phasing)

That Overskill radius boost makes d10s look strong again in this lineup, especially for higher-skill units.

But I don't recommend allowing perfect dice conversion, because a lot of systems start to break when you can increase beyond the original number of damage dice. Trading from multiple small dice to a single large die is fine, but not the other way around.
User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby dilanski » Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:52 am

stubby wrote:Wait, I get it now. "Weighted against d10" means a perfect conversion between dice, so you're rolling two and a half d4s for a d10, which isn't really allowed in the normal rules. But if you're house-ruling in perfect dice-to-dice conversions, then including recursive bonus rolls, your numbers will look like this:

    AR+1C Weighted 1d10
    :d4: 8.33 (d4s roll bonus d4s)
    :d6: 7
    :d8: 6.28
    :d10: 5.92
    :d12: 5.71

Now the d4s look like the clear winner. But the numbers start to tighten up again when you incorporate Overskill:

    Standard minifig
    :d4: 8.88 (fire)
    :d6: 7.7 (AP)
    :d8: 7.12 (-distance)
    :d10: 6.91 (+2" radius on 1/6th of rolls)
    :d12:  6.852 (phasing)

    Hero
    :d4: 9.995 (fire)
    :d6: 9.1 (AP)
    :d8: 8.79 (-distance)
    :d10: 8.88 (+2" radius on 1/2 of rolls)
    :d12: 9.135 (phasing)

That Overskill radius boost makes d10s look strong again in this lineup, especially for higher-skill units.

But I don't recommend allowing perfect dice conversion, because a lot of systems start to break when you can increase beyond the original number of damage dice. Trading from multiple small dice to a single large die is fine, but not the other way around.


I was under the impression that 6d10 could become 10d6 or 15d4, as trading in an explosive that does 1d10 for a firebomb that does 1d4 seemed a little underwhelming.

Also seems there have been a bunch of rule changes I have missed as overskill sounds completely different from what I remember it as. Also last I remember d4's never got bonus dice. I probably need to go back and figure out what has changed before actually trying to make stats for stuff. (I haven't been missing a changelog somewhere have I?)
User avatar
dilanski
Now with added tractor fetish
 
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:41 am
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & Subjugated Ireland

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Fri Mar 17, 2017 12:21 pm

dilanski wrote:I was under the impression that 6d10 could become 10d6 or 15d4, as trading in an explosive that does 1d10 for a firebomb that does 1d4 seemed a little underwhelming.

It's a 1d4 firebomb with 2" radius, so less damage but more fire-starting potential.

Alternate Damage isn't supposed to be strictly equivalent - you're trading off numerical Damage for special-purpose Damage effects.

dilanski wrote:Also seems there have been a bunch of rule changes I have missed as overskill sounds completely different from what I remember it as. Also last I remember d4's never got bonus dice. I probably need to go back and figure out what has changed before actually trying to make stats for stuff. (I haven't been missing a changelog somewhere have I?)

This thread is the changelog. Only 97 pages, so it's still shorter than BW2001.

Overskill now grants a Benny on any Skill Roll of a natural 6 or higher. When used to increase Damage, it adds one extra die of any die type already in the attack's Damage rating, along with associated Damage effects (in particular the extra +2" for d10s), rather than the usual Bonus d6.

http://brikwars.com/rules/2010/4.htm#2
http://brikwars.com/rules/2010/10.htm#1

D4s now get special Bonus d4s, because they didn't seem chaotic enough before but I still didn't want to give them any d6 potential.

http://brikwars.com/rules/2010/mc.htm#2
User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Tzan » Sat Mar 18, 2017 4:20 pm

I'd like to convert a 1d8 to 4d2s with bonus d2s on a roll of 2, this seems reasonable ... to some people.
User avatar
Tzan
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
 
Posts: 3965
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby RedRover » Sat Mar 18, 2017 4:52 pm

Is a d2 just a poker chip or something?
User avatar
RedRover
I want you to be
I want you to be
 
Posts: 2159
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:36 pm
Location: Desert

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Tzan » Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:17 pm

RedRover wrote:Is a d2 just a poker chip or something?


You could do it with dice, even / odd.
User avatar
Tzan
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
 
Posts: 3965
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Kommander Ken » Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:59 pm

D2 is a Star Wars character, duh.
User avatar
Kommander Ken
bad at shitposting
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:25 am
Location: The Frozen Wastes

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Narwhal King » Thu Mar 30, 2017 6:29 am

Anybody else not seeing the special ability descriptions in the army section? Someone said that The Mechanik, The Engineer, The Cybernetik, The Infiltrator, The Saboteur, The Assassin, The Sniper, The Commando, The Leader, The Commander, and The Great Leader are just not in the book yet. Is that true?
User avatar
Narwhal King
Nice Dubs
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:44 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Thu Mar 30, 2017 4:52 pm

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Rulebook

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests