BW 2010 feedback

Rules questions, suggestions, and discussion

Moderators: IVhorseman, Pwnerade

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby samuelzz10 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:30 pm

I saw you post this in a 2010 topic:
stubby wrote:The 2010 rules are almost done, I'm not going to go back and re-edit them all over again. Just curiosity more than anything else.
Image
Spoiler: show
my old sig
Image

WARNING: Posts in forum may have been edited by forum
User avatar
samuelzz10
n00b
n00b
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:09 pm
Location: planet express

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:44 pm

lol
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
User avatar
stubby
Their rulebook's been WIP for a year? what a bunch of slackers
 
Posts: 4106
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Pwnerade » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:30 pm

Image

That man is stubby promising us rules in 2010, and the woman is us.
An army marches on its stomach, and its favorite food is fudge.
User avatar
Pwnerade
Mega Blok
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:18 am
Location: Kent, WA

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby samuelzz10 » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:09 am

Btw, will you introduce HP again, like in the 2001 rules?
Image
Spoiler: show
my old sig
Image

WARNING: Posts in forum may have been edited by forum
User avatar
samuelzz10
n00b
n00b
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:09 pm
Location: planet express

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:13 am

Nope. Size damage and redshirts have taken the place of hit points.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
User avatar
stubby
Their rulebook's been WIP for a year? what a bunch of slackers
 
Posts: 4106
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Zupponn » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:51 am

Pwnerade wrote:Image

That man is stubby promising us rules in 2010, and the woman is us.

Damn, we're pretty hot!
Image
User avatar
Zupponn
if you give us money we will give you product
if you give us money we will give you product
 
Posts: 4736
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:15 pm
Location: Wisconsin, land of the cheese

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Ham » Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:48 am

Zupponn wrote:
Pwnerade wrote:Image

That man is stubby promising us rules in 2010, and the woman is us.

Damn, we're pretty hot!


I'd do us.
stubby wrote: my floppy penis gets first dibs on it for tradition's sake, but it doesn't seem likely that he'll want to stick around long enough to play.

Image
Wightbagel died for our sins.
User avatar
Ham
A 701 error is fine too.
A 701 error is fine too.
 
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:11 pm
Location: Wetting my whistle at the watering hole

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby *CRAZYHORSE* » Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:13 pm

stubby wrote:Nope. Size damage and redshirts have taken the place of hit points.

For the better.
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.
User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
Mega Blok
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby samuelzz10 » Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:34 pm

*CRAZYHORSE* wrote:
stubby wrote:Nope. Size damage and redshirts have taken the place of hit points.

For the better.
Some may think, but I like HP because some vehicles are some-what small but have heavy armor, and it would make sense to have better protection. At least a brief mention as an alternative, like in the 2001 rules some stuff was either :), :p, or :( depending on how good it was.
Ham701 wrote:
Zupponn wrote:
Pwnerade wrote:
That man is stubby promising us rules in 2010, and the woman is us.

Damn, we're pretty hot!


I'd do us.

Now read that without the picture.
Image
Spoiler: show
my old sig
Image

WARNING: Posts in forum may have been edited by forum
User avatar
samuelzz10
n00b
n00b
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:09 pm
Location: planet express

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby IVhorseman » Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:42 am

I don't know when the image of Benny and Natalya playing nano metabrikwars got added, but that is hilarious.
User avatar
IVhorseman
If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
 
Posts: 5306
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: The Abyss

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Warhead » Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:40 pm

Any chance I could have that picture of J+B getting kicked into Brikthulu's maw from ZZD on the MOCkeries page?  :warhead:
Image
User avatar
Warhead
kaka pants
 
Posts: 7281
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: I'm Momnipresent.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Rev. Sylvanus » Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:45 pm

In Chapter Three under Desperate Measures, it mentions that grabbing and shoving are automatic hits.

In Chapter Five under Close Combat, it mentions that shoving requires a skill roll.

If a shove is automatic, to what do you compare a parry roll that attempts to deflect the shove?
For Your Reading Pleasure: Rev's Battle Reports

Reference Sheets: Animals and Mounts / Medieval Weapons

Factions: Dragon Guard / Hiimboredagain Raiders
User avatar
Rev. Sylvanus
Jaw-Jaw
 
Posts: 971
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:14 pm
Location: Appalachia

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:58 pm

I'm doing a rolling revision, chapters 1-3 are complete and I'm currently working on chapter four. So you'll see some discrepancies between 1-3 and everything else.  Armored renamed to Shielded, in particular, and the stuff about automatic hits.

When I get around to chapter 5, Shoves are no longer Parried. Instead, there's a new Counter for Resist Shove. Shover and shovee each roll their Size(d6), and the higher roll wins.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
User avatar
stubby
Their rulebook's been WIP for a year? what a bunch of slackers
 
Posts: 4106
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby *CRAZYHORSE* » Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:12 pm

In the grey box about the minifig next to chapter 10.1 it says a minifig structure level is 0 when the 2010 rulebook states it's structure level is 0.5.
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.
User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
Mega Blok
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Gungnir » Wed Mar 06, 2013 1:20 am

*CRAZYHORSE* wrote:In the grey box about the minifig next to chapter 10.1 it says a minifig structure level is 0 when the 2010 rulebook states it's structure level is 0.5.

I brought this up earlier. It's because a lot of the '10 rulebook was copy-pasted from the '05 one, and hasn't been edited yet.
BrikThulhu eats 1d6 minifigs each turn.
User avatar
Gungnir
Jaw-Jaw
 
Posts: 941
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Rulebook

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest