Page 56 of 102

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:44 pm
by stubby
lol

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:30 pm
by Pwnerade
Image

That man is stubby promising us rules in 2010, and the woman is us.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:09 am
by samuelzz10
Btw, will you introduce HP again, like in the 2001 rules?

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:13 am
by stubby
Nope. Size damage and redshirts have taken the place of hit points.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:51 am
by Zupponn
Pwnerade wrote:Image

That man is stubby promising us rules in 2010, and the woman is us.

Damn, we're pretty hot!

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:48 am
by Ham
Zupponn wrote:
Pwnerade wrote:Image

That man is stubby promising us rules in 2010, and the woman is us.

Damn, we're pretty hot!


I'd do us.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:13 pm
by *CRAZYHORSE*
stubby wrote:Nope. Size damage and redshirts have taken the place of hit points.

For the better.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:34 pm
by samuelzz10
*CRAZYHORSE* wrote:
stubby wrote:Nope. Size damage and redshirts have taken the place of hit points.

For the better.
Some may think, but I like HP because some vehicles are some-what small but have heavy armor, and it would make sense to have better protection. At least a brief mention as an alternative, like in the 2001 rules some stuff was either :), :p, or :( depending on how good it was.
Ham701 wrote:
Zupponn wrote:
Pwnerade wrote:
That man is stubby promising us rules in 2010, and the woman is us.

Damn, we're pretty hot!


I'd do us.

Now read that without the picture.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:42 am
by IVhorseman
I don't know when the image of Benny and Natalya playing nano metabrikwars got added, but that is hilarious.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:40 pm
by Warhead
Any chance I could have that picture of J+B getting kicked into Brikthulu's maw from ZZD on the MOCkeries page?  :warhead:

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:45 pm
by Rev. Sylvanus
In Chapter Three under Desperate Measures, it mentions that grabbing and shoving are automatic hits.

In Chapter Five under Close Combat, it mentions that shoving requires a skill roll.

If a shove is automatic, to what do you compare a parry roll that attempts to deflect the shove?

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:58 pm
by stubby
I'm doing a rolling revision, chapters 1-3 are complete and I'm currently working on chapter four. So you'll see some discrepancies between 1-3 and everything else.  Armored renamed to Shielded, in particular, and the stuff about automatic hits.

When I get around to chapter 5, Shoves are no longer Parried. Instead, there's a new Counter for Resist Shove. Shover and shovee each roll their Size(d6), and the higher roll wins.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:12 pm
by *CRAZYHORSE*
In the grey box about the minifig next to chapter 10.1 it says a minifig structure level is 0 when the 2010 rulebook states it's structure level is 0.5.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 1:20 am
by Gungnir
*CRAZYHORSE* wrote:In the grey box about the minifig next to chapter 10.1 it says a minifig structure level is 0 when the 2010 rulebook states it's structure level is 0.5.

I brought this up earlier. It's because a lot of the '10 rulebook was copy-pasted from the '05 one, and hasn't been edited yet.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:24 am
by mercury19
I am hoping to print out the rules. Is there an easy way to do this? For the 2010 ones of course. Formatting it on MS word is painful, to say the least.