Page 1 of 1

Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:13 am
by Legofighter
For all those WW2 guys who want better stats than just the "rifle","machine gun","smg",stuff
The PPSh
Range:10"
UR:4
CP:6
Damage:1d6-1
Notes: Automatic Fire(+2)
http://www.brickarms.com/Toys/Weapons/PPSh.aspx

M1919
Range:12"
UR:4
CP:7
Dmg:1d8
Notes:Automatic Fire(+2),Ammo Box(+1)
http://www.brickarms.com/Toys/weapons/M1919.aspx

BAR
Range:8"(11)(+1" if stationary)(with bipod)
UR:4
CP:5
Dmg:1d8
http://www.brickarms.com/Toys/weapons/BAR.aspx

MG42
Range:Finger Arc
UR:4(3) (with bipod)
CP:6
Dmg:1d6+2
Notes:Automatic fire(+2)
http://www.brickarms.com/Toys/weapons/MG42.aspx

M1917
Range: :666:"
UR:3
CP:3
Dmg: 1d6
Notes:revolver
http://www.brickarms.com/Toys/weapons/M1917.aspx

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:34 am
by Legofighter
:wtf: is nobody replying?

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:43 am
by Silverdream
Why are you necroing? Why are you double posting?

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:51 am
by tymon555
Silverdream wrote:Why are you necroing? Why are you double posting?

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:12 am
by Keldoclock
wtf 12" range on the world's worst submachine gun

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:29 pm
by IVhorseman
Silverdream wrote:Why are you necroing? Why are you double posting?
Because he wants feedback. As you can see, it sometimes works.

For example, these weapons would probably be more effective if they uh... dealt damage.

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:04 am
by *CRAZYHORSE*
Usually people don't reply if it is either boring or bad. They just don't wan't to be rude.
Anyway now that you got us talking your range is completely off, 20"for a BAR with a bipod? seriously 20"?

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:19 am
by Falk
IVhorseman wrote:For example, these weapons would probably be more effective if they uh... dealt damage.
:roll: :lol:

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:02 pm
by Legofighter
Silverdream wrote:Why are you necroing? Why are you double posting?
NO SILVA ALLOWED!
Falk wrote:
IVhorseman wrote:For example, these weapons would probably be more effective if they uh... dealt damage.
:roll: :lol:
Fix'd!
Also, changed the BAR stats(12" with bipod)

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:58 pm
by IVhorseman
Wait, how is "Finger Arc" an acceptable substitute for range? Is it the length of my fingers?

As for the actual weapons, the M1917 is just a regular pistol, and the other weapons just seem to have arbitrary incredible distances for their range. I'd drop the BAR and tommy gun down to 8" with better URs (you'll pretty much never hit with any of these unless you're a hero), and bump the damage for the PPSh to regular old 1d6 (doing zero damage on 1/3 of the rolls is a lot less fun than it sounds). Not sure what automatic fire (+2) means, or ammo box.

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 3:40 pm
by Keldoclock
IVhorseman wrote: As for the actual weapons, the M1917 is just a regular pistol
FILTH AND LIES!

Image

It is the greatest .45 revolver ever made.

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:09 pm
by IVhorseman
stat-wise, not irl.
:sparta:

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:37 pm
by Legofighter
IVhorseman wrote:Wait, how is "Finger Arc" an acceptable substitute for range? Is it the length of my fingers?
Not sure what automatic fire (+2) means, or ammo box.
Finger arc= Flamethrower range
Automatic fire: May fire multiple shots each turns (damage is then (number of shots)d6-(number of shots))
Ammo box: If automatic fire and something happens (forgot what exactly), doesn't need to reload next turn
and +2 means +2 cp.
Keldoclock wrote:
IVhorseman wrote: As for the actual weapons, the M1917 is just a regular pistol
FILTH AND LIES!

Image

It is the greatest .45 revolver ever made.
Made it even better: 666" of range!

Re: Historical Weapons stats

Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 6:21 pm
by IVhorseman
See, that's actually both distinct AND awesome.

666" is roughly equivalent to infinite, but it's totally :666: