How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Also, butts.

Moderators: Blitzen, Almighty Benny, Falk

User avatar
Tzan
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Posts: 4799
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Tzan » Tue May 03, 2016 7:17 pm

Steel_Valkyrie talking to his mom:
"We've been discussing your ass on the internet and we have come to the conclusion that your ass's gravitational effect on other objects in the universe is Inconsequential."

User avatar
Overwatch_Elite
In ™ We Trust Overwatch
In ™ We Trust Overwatch
Posts: 958
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:31 pm

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Overwatch_Elite » Tue May 03, 2016 8:20 pm

when i make topics about stuff i don't understand natalya bans me and i get grounded smh white people

User avatar
Steel_Valkyrie
Also sounding like a whiny bitch
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:04 pm

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Steel_Valkyrie » Tue May 03, 2016 8:42 pm

Tzan wrote:Steel_Valkyrie talking to his mom:
"We've been discussing your ass on the internet and we have come to the conclusion that your ass's gravitational effect on other objects in the universe is Inconsequential."
Pretty much, yeah.
Image

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
Posts: 5201
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by stubby » Tue May 03, 2016 9:36 pm

Steel_Valkyrie wrote:
stubby wrote:Whenever you hear a captain in a sci-fi show say "come about," that's what it means. It's a nautical term for bringing your ship into alignment. You hear it in Star Trek a lot when the Enterprise encounters other vessels.
Okay, that's assuming they can tell up from down. Being arrogant, we'd probably make the north pole the "up" side. But what explains that every other alien ship also comes at enterprise completely level and flat to them? Wouldn't their species have an "Up" of it's own? And why does everything happen in 2D? All the ships are at the same level.
They're aligning to whatever the other ship is using as "up." There is no absolute, universal up. The camera rotates to match. They could both be completely upside-down and sideways, but as long as they and the camera are all aligned with each other then it looks like a flat plane on the TV screen.

Part of the reason that everybody aligns to each other is that it presents the smallest target area to a potentially hostile opponent. It's a practical consideration.
Steel_Valkyrie wrote:But they always say "Full-stop" to investigate some wreck.
Full stop, relative to the wreck. Since there's no absolute frame of reference for motion in space, there's no absolute frame of reference for stopping either. You can only be "stopped" relative to another object. If you and the object are both traveling at half lightspeed in the same direction, you are at a full stop relative to the object.
Steel_Valkyrie wrote:
stubby wrote:it's hard to prove that there is any part of the universe that hasn't felt the effects of your mom's fat ass.
Technically, It has. Everything in the universe feels the pull of everything else. It's usually very, very, very small, Enough to call "Inconsequential"
Nope. This argument might have worked last month, but since then we've proven that gravitational waves propagate at the speed of light. Everything in the universe feels the pull of everything else once the gravitational waves reach between them, but the speed of light has limits. If there's a part of the universe that's far away enough when the gravitational wave is sent, then the wave won't reach it before the relative expansion of the universe in between exceeds the speed of light, which is already happening. Over vast enough distances, space expands faster than lightspeed can cross it. No one knows why.
Steel_Valkyrie wrote:
stubby wrote:This is a stretch. Thinking only proves that something exists to do the thinking, but not that the thing you think of as "you" is what's doing the thinking. Even what you think of as "you" could just as easily be a computer program playing a pre-recorded script of a brain thinking that it exists.
Yep, and Still, My argument stands. "I" would then be the computer, and "I" would still only Know that "I" am the only one capable of free thought.
Only as much as a book where your thoughts were written down could be considered "you." It doesn't seem to me that a static recording counts as actual thought, even if it's played on a very nice playback system.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?

User avatar
RedRover
I want you to be
I want you to be
Posts: 2706
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:36 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by RedRover » Tue May 03, 2016 9:46 pm

Steel, if you want to win, get the thread moved to marblecake, Mike won't go in there.

User avatar
Steel_Valkyrie
Also sounding like a whiny bitch
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:04 pm

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Steel_Valkyrie » Tue May 03, 2016 9:51 pm

Killjoy. Still. They should come from all around, from above and below the enterprise.
Image

User avatar
Zahru II
I kinda like it if the lady's dominant...
I kinda like it if the lady's dominant...
Posts: 4462
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:22 am
Contact:

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Zahru II » Wed May 04, 2016 7:51 am

RedRover wrote:Steel, if you want to win, get the thread moved to marblecake, Mike won't go in there.
I think you unintentionally won the thread with this one RR.
Image
My stuff: Medivo / Armylists / Battles / SPACE

User avatar
Steel_Valkyrie
Also sounding like a whiny bitch
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:04 pm

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Steel_Valkyrie » Wed May 04, 2016 8:49 am

Congratulations, RR.
Image

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
Posts: 5201
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by stubby » Wed May 04, 2016 9:05 am

gg everyone
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?

User avatar
Overwatch_Elite
In ™ We Trust Overwatch
In ™ We Trust Overwatch
Posts: 958
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:31 pm

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Overwatch_Elite » Wed May 04, 2016 10:26 am

wheres my participation ribbon

User avatar
Tzan
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Posts: 4799
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Tzan » Wed May 04, 2016 10:38 am

You already have one under your avatar.

Its:

Red
Green
Piss brown

User avatar
Zupponn
if you give us money we will give you product
if you give us money we will give you product
Posts: 5603
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:15 pm
Location: Back in Wisconsin!

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Zupponn » Thu May 05, 2016 1:07 am

I'm disappointed that nobody mentioned the idea of multiple realities for the time traveling thing.
Image

User avatar
The Shadowscythe
Touch my cloud song and I will fuck you up
Touch my cloud song and I will fuck you up
Posts: 2351
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:22 am
Location: Llandysul, Ceredigion, Wales, U.K, Earth, Sol, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Universe.

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by The Shadowscythe » Thu May 05, 2016 1:41 am

Yeah but then we'd have more than one ass.

And this forum is having trouble enough just talking about one ass, how do you think these kids would deal with the prospect of infinite ass?
-- WARNINK -- LINK BELOW IZ KNOWN TO CAUZE HEMMORAGE --
Spoiler
Show
Image

I WARNED YOU, DIDN'T I WARN YOU?! BLAME RAYHAWK DAMNIT.
Image

User avatar
Steel_Valkyrie
Also sounding like a whiny bitch
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:04 pm

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by Steel_Valkyrie » Thu May 05, 2016 8:22 am

More of a chest guy myself.
Image

User avatar
RedRover
I want you to be
I want you to be
Posts: 2706
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:36 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: How Sci-Fi Shows are wrong.

Post by RedRover » Thu May 05, 2016 8:48 am

More of a chess guy myself

Post Reply
cron