muffinman42 wrote:The shark uses his powers of rule of cool to suspend your disbelief.
I am VERY sorry for any productivity lost due to me linking you to that site...
Forticus wrote:As the shark "is standing next to the appropriate controls" (QuikLaws, Q.2.3, Siege Weapon) one might argue that the shark is a Minifig and the vehicle a Siege Weapon, as indicated by it's front design. It may be up to the opponent to proof the shark not "to be in good standing".
Based on BrikLaws I would probably argue that the construction is controled by an intelligent operator. In case the opponent starts to argue about the intelligence of a shark, Q.1.2 will apply.
oh... who I am ? I was told, the accent of my writing is typical German. That's the language I tried to translate QuikLaws into, yesterday. More of an introduction later ... 3 Minutes left to see my dentist.
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests