Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
Moderators: Scratch, OneEye589
- Silent-sigfig
- can you feel me?
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:20 pm
- Location: Number one in USA
Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
Although neither the Obama or Romney campaigns are playable, I will accept anyone who wants to play. Sign up now.
BFenix wrote:Coolest 1000th post everSilent-sigfig wrote:
Re: Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
I'll play. Whatever guy works.
Re: Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
I'll take any party whose platform involves explosions. Make one up, please.
Tzan wrote:That's what Hitler said,Semaj Nagirrac wrote:Well, I took some land without checking if it was owned by a faction or not. I'm not going to be banned, am I? I can destroy everything if need be.
in 1938.
Re: Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
dibs on nader
Tzan wrote:Are you getting your ideas for posts from fortune cookies?Silverdream wrote:the link for a kingdom in turmoil leads to grave tidings.
Re: Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
I'll take anyone. I did pretty well in your last politics themed forum battle, so maybe I'll pull out another win.
Han Solo wrote: Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side kid.
-
- Catastrophe Magnet
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:04 pm
- Location: This Forum
Re: Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
[]
Last edited by cleanupcrew on Thu May 27, 2021 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Silverdream
- Nice use of noise
- Posts: 6078
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:33 pm
- Location: Sweating like a guy in a basketball manga
Re: Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
I will be Steven Harper. He is the android prime minister of Canada.
This sig is too fucking large: show anyway
Re: Election 2012, part two: Competing special interests
I want MECHA COLBERT!
Empire of Luchardsko WIP wiki pageBrikWars 2010 Rules wrote:BrikWars ... stands in pretty direct opposition to many fundamental elements of the LEGO® philosophy, such as "Not Teaching Kids How Funny It Is to Set People on Fire."