Moderators: fredde, Dr. X, ikensall
Falk wrote:Call it the Conjoined 'E'.
aoffan23 wrote:EDIT: @Whiteagle: I almost thought you were using dark tan again. I assume that if you plan to make that IRL that the tan pieces will be the ones from the old AAT set?
Zupponn wrote:I'm looking forward to how the vehicle will turn out, but I can't help thinking that the fighter would be awesome as a gun for a giant mecha.
Whiteagle wrote:Yep!
...How would one stat printed-on weapons anyways?
Tzan wrote:Quantumsurfer wrote:I generally agree with TzanWarhead wrote:I agree with QuantumSmurfer.
I agree with Warhead.
aoffan23 wrote:Missile tubes? Man, I always thought they were just intakes, but I pretended they were weapons whenever I used them in a MOC.
aoffan23 wrote:EDIT: On the topic of this set, I'm still waiting for them to make an updated version, since they already did the Clone Wars one.
Whiteagle wrote:Doubtful, but we could hopefully get something like the Ground Armored Tank...
Zupponn wrote:The GAT reminds me of a Scorpion from Halo.
Zupponn wrote:The Crab Droid reminds me of a Scarab too.
Whiteagle wrote:Zupponn wrote:The GAT reminds me of a Scorpion from Halo.
Yeah, it isn't nearly as original as the TIE Crawler...
...How would one stat printed-on weapons anyways?
lawmaster wrote:Kill him again.Bragallot wrote:He's already dead.lawmaster wrote:Kill the guy I'm in cc with.
Bragallot wrote:It's not even that expensive, but seriously, it's a poor design imo.
Bragallot wrote:...How would one stat printed-on weapons anyways?
'According to the rulebook', not.
Ex_Bajir wrote:Bragallot wrote:It's not even that expensive, but seriously, it's a poor design imo.
Poorly constructed or just a dumb fucking idea?
Seriously though,whoever designed the TIE crawler must have had no knowledge of armored vehicle design.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests