17th CMEF Titan MKIII
Moderators: Zahru II, Bragallot, RedRover, Natalya
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
This is absolutly great, but I would add some missiles, Lots of missiles!
- halo 3000
- I though bringing it up might possibly get me one
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:07 pm
- Location: NC
- Contact:
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
Thanks! I entered it into the brickarms make a mech contest,so hopefully, they think the same.WICKED SICK, TWILIGHT SPARKLE APPROVED
Explain commanding. I had the vertical tank thing going on the whole time. look at my original inspirationi expected something more commanding put on top of them.
When I knew I couldn't replicate the body, I went through a bunch of designs in my head. then I saw this on brickshelf
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=2642612
Its too big to post, but here's the link.
I wanted to do something like that, but I didn't know how. so it took me about a month to build this.
Haha, soon I will build a railgun on one of the arms like we talked about that day...MY GOD. This is . . . just . . .
Sure! its really simple, just a 1x2 plate.Could we see a picture of how it connects from the legs to the cockpit?
Good guess! but nope. used that many times in this guy though.I would guess it's this.
Haha, I love how you saw my inspiration without me saying anything about 40k in the op. I love the Warhound. It's pretty much what I based the body on. And Thanks!If you changed the head a bit it would look EXACTLY like a WH40k Warhound titan
Good idea, but a little out there for CMEF. I'll probably just have the Titan stomp and shake them off that way.Am I the only one thinking of this leaving behind its legs when invaders start climbing it and flying around blowing shit up?
Thanks! That's one of the best compliments you could give me.Your builds pack a good amount of NPUs
You just got me thinking of adding a SAM turret on top.I would just add some moar dakka to counter infantry or aircraft.
Thanks!This is extremely impressive. Its "Intimidation factor" is working at 100%.
I built a USA mech that large once.
Haha, I hear ya!I would add some missiles, Lots of missiles
"My name is Art Vandelay. I'm an architect."~George Costanza
- BFenix
- Pooplord
- Posts: 4112
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:13 pm
- Location: City Of Ravens (Lisbon)
- Contact:
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
Uncle Sam/Lady Liberty Mech.Silent-sigfig wrote:I built a USA mech that large once.
I didn't like the ammo belt though.
Maybe I'll try agaiin
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
Make a mech contest huh? I'll upvote it if I have the time.
mr.duckie wrote:Get Him!!!!SirCheese wrote:I will be neutral. (Cuz I don't want to make enemies)
This sig is too fucking large: show anyway
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
Well. THIS IS AWESOME but I have one question. How long will it last against the vindicator?
- halo 3000
- I though bringing it up might possibly get me one
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:07 pm
- Location: NC
- Contact:
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
They have judges that will pick 3 winners. no voting from the public, but thanks anyway!Make a mech contest huh? I'll upvote it if I have the time.
Well, I would probably have the Titan distract it while a squad of my assault marines jumped on top. 1v1 though, not very long.How long will it last against the vindicator?
"My name is Art Vandelay. I'm an architect."~George Costanza
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
In my house rules, Mechs get a range advantage over tanks because their guns are (usually) set higher
Last edited by Bragallot on Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
If you see a banner on the home page that a judge has gone missing, don't ask.halo 3000 wrote: They have judges that will pick 3 winners. no voting from the public, but thanks anyway!
Spoiler
Show
He'll be in a wharehouse with me... watching Friendship is Magic while eating UBER NOMS.
mr.duckie wrote:Get Him!!!!SirCheese wrote:I will be neutral. (Cuz I don't want to make enemies)
This sig is too fucking large: show anyway
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
Did you put that 'h' in warehouse intentionally so we would read it as whorehouse?
-
- Catastrophe Magnet
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:04 pm
- Location: This Forum
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
[]
Last edited by cleanupcrew on Thu May 27, 2021 10:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
He shoots, he scores!
To stay on topic, I think if you want a real tank-killer you need a fast-moving mech with a high-powered melee-weapon (yeah yeah, basically Knightmares) as that is where mechs can have the advantage over tanks (I wouldn't mind it, but I haven't seen a tank with a melee weapon yet) as it's much easier to put a lot of firepower on a tank imo. That said this thing will kill most average-to-large sized tanks, but if you're going to fight STD's, well.
To stay on topic, I think if you want a real tank-killer you need a fast-moving mech with a high-powered melee-weapon (yeah yeah, basically Knightmares) as that is where mechs can have the advantage over tanks (I wouldn't mind it, but I haven't seen a tank with a melee weapon yet) as it's much easier to put a lot of firepower on a tank imo. That said this thing will kill most average-to-large sized tanks, but if you're going to fight STD's, well.
- halo 3000
- I though bringing it up might possibly get me one
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:07 pm
- Location: NC
- Contact:
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
That sounds about right. The range should be higher based on the elevation. I was thinking tank killer because it can out range them with its big guns and long range. STD's would be a problem though. Maybe I'll built artillery next.In my house rules, Mechs get a range advantage over tanks because their guns are (usually) set higher
"My name is Art Vandelay. I'm an architect."~George Costanza
-
- Catastrophe Magnet
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:04 pm
- Location: This Forum
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
That may be debatable given the angle of the tank turret's gun. If you really wanted to be that specific about the range, then a simple formula for projectile motion is given by the following set of parametric equations:halo 3000 wrote:That sounds about right. The range should be higher based on the elevation. I was thinking tank killer because it can out range them with its big guns and long range. STD's would be a problem though. Maybe I'll built artillery next.In my house rules, Mechs get a range advantage over tanks because their guns are (usually) set higher
x = t(vcosz)
y = -.5gt^2 + t(vsinz) + h
x = horizontal distance, y = vertical distance, t = time, z = initial angle, v = initial velocity, g = gravitational constant, h = initial height.
My cursory examination yields the result that initial height does not affect the range (vertical distance).
- Robot Monkey
- My Little Pony
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:47 pm
- Location: The Edge
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
Nice job! Reminds me of my "Omega Doom" supermecha I built a while ago.
- Ben-Jammin
- Mega Blok
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:59 pm
- Location: Not quite the middle of Appalachia
Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII
Anorak senses tingling...Colette wrote:That may be debatable given the angle of the tank turret's gun. If you really wanted to be that specific about the range, then a simple formula for projectile motion is given by the following set of parametric equations:halo 3000 wrote:That sounds about right. The range should be higher based on the elevation. I was thinking tank killer because it can out range them with its big guns and long range. STD's would be a problem though. Maybe I'll built artillery next.In my house rules, Mechs get a range advantage over tanks because their guns are (usually) set higher
x = t(vcosz)
y = -.5gt^2 + t(vsinz) + h
x = horizontal distance, y = vertical distance, t = time, z = initial angle, v = initial velocity, g = gravitational constant, h = initial height.
My cursory examination yields the result that initial height does not affect the range (vertical distance).
DANGER WILL ROBINSON