Keldoclock wrote:Clearly it would re-appear on the other side of the board with momentum intact
Explosive size
Moderators: Pwnerade, IVhorseman
Re: Explosive size
Empire of Luchardsko WIP wiki pageBrikWars 2010 Rules wrote:BrikWars ... stands in pretty direct opposition to many fundamental elements of the LEGO® philosophy, such as "Not Teaching Kids How Funny It Is to Set People on Fire."
- aoffan23
- You can nail me with your wood. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Posts: 2702
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:41 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: Explosive size
I think any units that fall off the table should continue fighting on the floor.
Spoiler
Show
Tzan wrote:I agree with Warhead.Quantumsurfer wrote:I generally agree with TzanWarhead wrote:I agree with QuantumSmurfer.
Re: Explosive size
Horribly mutated of course, since you don't expect to go outside the boundaries of reality unscathed, do you?Keldoclock wrote:Clearly it would re-appear on the other side of the board with momentum intact
- Unlimited Overkill
- Nice Dubs
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:38 pm
Re: Explosive size
Whiteagle wrote:Horribly mutated of course, since you don't expect to go outside the boundaries of reality unscathed, do you?Keldoclock wrote:Clearly it would re-appear on the other side of the board with momentum intact
Re: Explosive size
I noticed that regardless of physical size, one can theoretically keep adding SuperNatural d10s to an explosion ad infinitum (or at least until you run out of CP).
Speaking of which, what's the general consensus around the BrikWars community about superweapons? Does it just depend on the scale of the battle?
Speaking of which, what's the general consensus around the BrikWars community about superweapons? Does it just depend on the scale of the battle?
LEGO are like boobs - designed for kids, but adults have plenty of fun playing with them too.
Re: Explosive size
I don't know if there is a general consensus. Superweapons in a small-scale battle usually means they're up against smaller units too small for superweapons to hit effectively, which then crawl all over the superweapon and end up commandeering it.Kirillyos wrote:I noticed that regardless of physical size, one can theoretically keep adding SuperNatural d10s to an explosion ad infinitum (or at least until you run out of CP).
Speaking of which, what's the general consensus around the BrikWars community about superweapons? Does it just depend on the scale of the battle?
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
Re: Explosive size
What about in large-scale battles or strategic conflicts?stubby wrote: I don't know if there is a general consensus. Superweapons in a small-scale battle usually means they're up against smaller units too small for superweapons to hit effectively, which then crawl all over the superweapon and end up commandeering it.
LEGO are like boobs - designed for kids, but adults have plenty of fun playing with them too.
Re: Explosive size
What about them? Obviously superweapons are cool in superweapon-scale conflicts, that should go without saying.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
Re: Explosive size
Apparently someone was building a house, and in the process found a pine cone which turned out to be a grenade.stubby wrote:In real life, all missiles look like rods no matter how big they get. Bombs sometimes look more like the bullets you're talking about, but not always. Grenades look like pineapples. In BrikWars, "Explosives" can be any one of those things, so all of those looks are completely okay.
Mnds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can borrow mine.
- Silverdream
- Nice use of noise
- Posts: 6078
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:33 pm
- Location: Sweating like a guy in a basketball manga
Re: Explosive size
Explosive damage is exempt from OOR damage penalties.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?