Sugquestion: CP ratios for various scenarios

Rules questions, suggestions, and discussion

Moderators: IVhorseman, Pwnerade

Sugquestion: CP ratios for various scenarios

Postby aybraus » Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:17 am

I'm going to be running a BW game that is an attack-defend scenario. I'm wondering what the CP ratio should be between the attacking and defending teams.
My thought is that that it should be the golden ratio (rounded, 8 attacker CPs for every 5 defender CPs) because the ratio works for most everything.

But yeah, I want to know what you all think.

EDIT: And the suggestion part is that such CP ratios should be listed in the rulebook.
TROLOLO
aybraus
Hero
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:48 am

Postby Rody » Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:21 am

my suggestion is that you ignore CP ratios and whatnot and move on to more important matters like how to blow up as much as possible.

in other words just go for what looks to be fair, usually it will then also be fair.
Act first, then think, then try to find a way to cover up the horrible mess you made.
Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
User avatar
Rody
My Little Pony
 
Posts: 1950
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:48 am
Location: Below sea-level

Postby superdave » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:40 am

Depending on the entrenchment of the defending team (scattered stones vs. a fortress), you may want to go as high as double for the attackers (2:1 or even 12:5)
TROLOLO
superdave
Hero
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:12 am
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Postby pesgores » Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:42 pm

superdave wrote:Depending on the entrenchment of the defending team (scattered stones vs. a fortress), you may want to go as high as double for the attackers (2:1 or even 12:5)


Yeah. My opinion too. Or else the attackers die quickly.

But who cares, you can just start a fight within the defenders so that cool, big old castle MOC gets finally destroyed in a cool way.
"You can get more of what you want with a kind word and a gun, that you can with just a kind word." - Al Capone
My official post number 1000 was "The whole battle?"
Image
User avatar
pesgores
The Dear Leader
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:47 am
Location: Looking for baseplates

Postby IVhorseman » Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:51 pm

actually, giving equal CP costs should pan out evenly. remember that the defenders are also spending points on walls, towers, entrenchments and all kinds of doo-hickeys and traps AS WELL AS their offense and minifigs, while the attackers are solely spending their precious CP on offense.
User avatar
IVhorseman
If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
 
Posts: 6648
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: The Abyss

Postby aybraus » Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:28 pm

IVhorseman wrote:actually, giving equal CP costs should pan out evenly. remember that the defenders are also spending points on walls, towers, entrenchments and all kinds of doo-hickeys and traps AS WELL AS their offense and minifigs, while the attackers are solely spending their precious CP on offense.


Yeah, I don't know what the first two replies were talking about--I mean INCLUDING fortifications.

But the thing is, the goal of the attackers is much more difficult than the goal of the defenders. The attackers have to push the line back, the defenders just have to hold it. In the event of a brutal stalemate, the defense wins.
TROLOLO
aybraus
Hero
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:48 am

Re: Sugquestion: CP ratios for various scenarios

Postby ahp77 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:03 pm

aybraus wrote:sugquestion


OSSUM!!! A NEW WORD FOR ME TO LEARN!!!! w007!!!
User avatar
ahp77
Jaw-Jaw
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 8:29 pm

Postby Adean » Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:36 pm

I say throw out the "g" and just say "suquestion". Ossum sauce. It's a suggestion in the form of a question.

I say fudge it all. Just do whatever looks coolest and whatever should be bloodiest.

I say.....
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s113/Demo_Thesis/achphp.jpg" border="0" alt="Ossum Sauce"></a>
TROLOLO
Adean
Minifig
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:01 pm
Location: California

Postby Bonn-o-Tron » Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:53 am

I dunno, a suggestion in the form of a question doesn't really work.
I don't see how you'd be able to practically use it in a conversation
Image
:rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei:
User avatar
Bonn-o-Tron
Playmobil
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:58 pm
Location: Brodmann area 17

Postby Adean » Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:16 am

Couldn't you have just thought before you posted?

May I propose that you try a different color scheme?

I say, might you have considered using a different head for that fig to flesh out his character?

Ta da.....

Course Blitzen could butcher my grammar here, but hey, I'm giving examples of a word that doesn't exist. I don't think there's too many rules for it yet.

Yay for suquestions!!!!!
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s113/Demo_Thesis/achphp.jpg" border="0" alt="Ossum Sauce"></a>
TROLOLO
Adean
Minifig
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:01 pm
Location: California

Postby pesgores » Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:54 pm

I DECLARE SUQUETIONS AS THE NEWEST TERM OF THE BACKWOARDS LANGUAGE
"You can get more of what you want with a kind word and a gun, that you can with just a kind word." - Al Capone
My official post number 1000 was "The whole battle?"
Image
User avatar
pesgores
The Dear Leader
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:47 am
Location: Looking for baseplates

Postby Blitzen » Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:05 pm

Adean wrote:Couldn't you have just thought before you posted?

May I propose that you try a different color scheme?

I say, might you have considered using a different head for that fig to flesh out his character?

Ta da.....

I say nay. The method you described was just a pompous manner of manipulation. That's not a question. It's a poorly disguised command.
Image
Often, literally, a pillow fight but may include similar situations like volleyball, particularly when wardrobe is skimpy and the action is bouncy.
User avatar
Blitzen
Distinguished Owner of the English Language
 
Posts: 1898
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:17 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Postby Jaye Tea » Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:51 pm

I agre with blitzen a suquestion doesn't work, its like my history teacher ask this so called question: Name three Egyptian Kings? There should be no ?, because its not asking its telling.
Glory be to the Bomb, and to the Holy Fallout. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be. World without end. May the Blessings of the Bomb Almighty, and the Fellowship of the Holy Fallout, descend upon us all. This day and forever more. Amen!
User avatar
Jaye Tea
Officer
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:32 pm
Location: Seattle-ish

Postby Bonn-o-Tron » Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:01 pm

Hooray! I was right!
Although, I had to wait for someone else to justify it
Image
:rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei:
User avatar
Bonn-o-Tron
Playmobil
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:58 pm
Location: Brodmann area 17

Postby Adean » Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:31 am

Ah well, it was a dumb idea anyway. Especially with how quickly Pezzy latched onto it. Still, I don't think those were commands though. That's like saying "Do you think you could pass me the mayonase" is a pompous form of manipulation thinly disguising the command "Pass the mayo."

I say trying to be gentle in your criticism isn't pompous. It's simply nicer is all. True, there really should be no question marks, but I was just making stuff up anyway.
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s113/Demo_Thesis/achphp.jpg" border="0" alt="Ossum Sauce"></a>
TROLOLO
Adean
Minifig
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:01 pm
Location: California

Next

Return to The Rulebook

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Quantumsurfer and 3 guests