"Leader" units
Moderators: Pwnerade, IVhorseman
Re: "Leader" units
Skill was my first thought, because that's how I currently value the Thrall sacrifices - but then sacrificing a Vermin or a Cannon Fodder gets you just as much bonus as sacrificing any frontline troop. CP is a very direct means of making the bonus equivalent to the value sacrificed, and you don't have to be tracking overall budgets to know the value of one scapegoat.
A Skill-based bonus is harder to write, because then I either have to write all the exceptions, or I have to mark all the exceptions with a Specialty: Worthless or something. Alternately, I can say that only minifigs with a Skill of 1d8 or higher can be scapegoats, but that really limits your options as a Leader.
A Skill-based bonus is harder to write, because then I either have to write all the exceptions, or I have to mark all the exceptions with a Specialty: Worthless or something. Alternately, I can say that only minifigs with a Skill of 1d8 or higher can be scapegoats, but that really limits your options as a Leader.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
- *CRAZYHORSE*
- Mega Blok
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
- Location: Procrasturbating.
Re: "Leader" units
I like this idea. it works well with the idea of having an executioner in your army to hunt down the scape goat.
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.
- aoffan23
- You can nail me with your wood. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Posts: 2702
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:41 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: "Leader" units
aoffan23 wrote:Maybe have the same dice pool as a penalty? While the leader is still alive, they grant the bonus dice. If they die, then the opponent who killed them gets to use those dice to penalize units however they see fit. So let's go with the 3d6 example, and say the opponent (after killing the leader) rolls a 5, a 3, and a 1. Again, I haven't read up on SuperNatural Dice, but I assume 1s are crit fails as always. So the player uses the 5 to stop a unit of regular minifigs from moving (-5"), the 3 to make a tank gunner miss (-3 to skill, assuming the skill roll is low enough), and the last die does nothing.stubby wrote:The dice pool would work, but it's just equivalent to what he would have if he were a SuperNatural unit. It means that there'd be no difference between killing an enemy Leader or killing some random enemy 3d6 wizard. It doesn't make him feel particularly important.
It would be pretty cool to see a player scramble to enough units work together to make it so that at least one unit could avoid a negative effect. It's the kind of desperation you'd see if an army lost their most valuable commander.
Sorry to dig this up, but I'm just wondering what stubby thinks of this idea, since I didn't really see it addressed. Too complicated?aoffan23 wrote:Just thought about how overpowered that effect could become, but I think I know a way around it. On the first turn after the leader dies, the opponent can use the full dice pool. Every turn afterward, they remove one die from the pool until there are none remaining, and the force has successfully regrouped. More powerful leaders will have much more dire consquences, and the player will feel it for more turns.
Spoiler
Show
Tzan wrote:I agree with Warhead.Quantumsurfer wrote:I generally agree with TzanWarhead wrote:I agree with QuantumSmurfer.
- IVhorseman
- If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
- Posts: 5293
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
- Location: The Abyss
- Contact:
Re: "Leader" units
To oppressive. If two people had leaders like that, they'd just use both of them to slow down each other's combat: Hell no.
Warhead wrote:my head burns with War.
Plastik Armory: a bunch of weapons and abilities compatible with the 2010 rules.
- aoffan23
- You can nail me with your wood. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Posts: 2702
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:41 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: "Leader" units
The dice penalties only apply after the leader is killed, and they run out shortly thereafter.IVhorseman wrote:To oppressive. If two people had leaders like that, they'd just use both of them to slow down each other's combat: Hell no.
Spoiler
Show
Tzan wrote:I agree with Warhead.Quantumsurfer wrote:I generally agree with TzanWarhead wrote:I agree with QuantumSmurfer.
Re: "Leader" units
I don't have an opinion yet. I like the idea of something bad happening when the leader dies, but this penalty doesn't have the kind of special flavor that gets me excited just yet. I was waiting to see if it inspired further development from anyone else.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
- IVhorseman
- If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
- Posts: 5293
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
- Location: The Abyss
- Contact:
Re: "Leader" units
Oh my bad, I misread that as something that the leader was able to do every friggin turn to the enemy team. It's nowhere near overpowered if it's just a one-time effect. Extending it over multiple turns is cool, but might be a bit game-wrecking. I guess the only thing to do is play-test it: I'll pitch the idea next brikwar and see what the consensus is.
Honestly, I don't really see why a leader guy's ability needs to be different than the thrall rules. Don't vermin/dimmies/j+b/cannon fodder only have 1d4 skill? You could just have a catch-all saying that only standard minifigs or better can be sacrificed, since the boneriffic d4 is already subject to so many specialties. What has 1d6 skill and would be a no-brainer sacrifice?
Honestly, I don't really see why a leader guy's ability needs to be different than the thrall rules. Don't vermin/dimmies/j+b/cannon fodder only have 1d4 skill? You could just have a catch-all saying that only standard minifigs or better can be sacrificed, since the boneriffic d4 is already subject to so many specialties. What has 1d6 skill and would be a no-brainer sacrifice?
Warhead wrote:my head burns with War.
Plastik Armory: a bunch of weapons and abilities compatible with the 2010 rules.
Re: "Leader" units
Both Vermin and Cannon Fodder has 1d6 Skill.
Re: "Leader" units
How about this: if a leader dies, all friendly figs in 1d6 have to spend the rest of the turn trying to build a memorial to him. In addition, depending on what exactly the leader did, it might be possible to send the leader's killer/ an enemy leader into Antagonist in Mourning, where that fig takes some form of (most likely WISG rolled) penalty.
Han Solo wrote: Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side kid.
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: "Leader" units
I think leaders have the potential to be quite heroic. It takes a lot of skill to send men to their deaths effectively and with a maximizing carnage effect. Certain tactical manoeuvres can change the tide of war and even history. There's a reason people like Alexander the Great have a heroic reputation. Take Alesia (Caesar) or Pharsalus (Caesar again): the men won the battle, but they couldn't have done it without his leadership. Thanks to Caesar, his army wasn't routed as quickly as it should've been and lots of Gauls were killed instead of smaller amounts of Romans -> More Carnage! That said, I think people are usually kinda uninspired when it comes to thinking up tactical feats and when it comes to simple mods I often lose track of them. I'm thinking of maybe trying to give the Falx a commander unit and a hero next time I field a large part of them to see how that works.
- IVhorseman
- If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
- Posts: 5293
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
- Location: The Abyss
- Contact:
Re: "Leader" units
Ok this is worth asking for clarification: does that CP bonus include weapons/armor/equipment? If it's just the fig it'll be a LOT easier to keep track of, but if it's weapons and everything else too, it'll turn into a shit-show. Unfortunately on the other hand, it makes the decision between scapegoating the minifig with an assault rifle and the minifig with a frying pan a hell of a lot easier.stubby wrote:The unit's CP cost is immediately converted into Instant Benny bonus points which can be divided up and spent during that turn by the Leader and/or any other subordinate units.
Warhead wrote:my head burns with War.
Plastik Armory: a bunch of weapons and abilities compatible with the 2010 rules.
- *CRAZYHORSE*
- Mega Blok
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
- Location: Procrasturbating.
Re: "Leader" units
I think only the minifig's skill would be the best option here. Keep it simple.
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.
- IVhorseman
- If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
- Posts: 5293
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
- Location: The Abyss
- Contact:
Re: "Leader" units
I guess this isn't the thread to really talk about this (but fuck it because ), but why don't they have 1d4? You could even drop the mook weapon down to a use of 2 and it'd still work great.Arkbrik wrote:Both Vermin and Cannon Fodder has 1d6 Skill.
Warhead wrote:my head burns with War.
Plastik Armory: a bunch of weapons and abilities compatible with the 2010 rules.
Re: "Leader" units
Because they are designed for there to be a lot of them, and people have lots of d6es in a way that they don't have lots of d4s. It's a convenience thing.
It wouldn't matter anyway, though, d6es vs d4s is not a good way to divide guys worth sacrificing from guys who aren't. Civilians have a d4 and they're TOTALLY sacrificable.
It wouldn't matter anyway, though, d6es vs d4s is not a good way to divide guys worth sacrificing from guys who aren't. Civilians have a d4 and they're TOTALLY sacrificable.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
Re: "Leader" units
Isn't that always the way in war?stubby wrote:Civilians have a d4 and they're TOTALLY sacrificable.
The World of Pekab & the Anarcho-Syndicalist Adventurers Guild <== new site
"Everything needs more Dakka, including the Dakka..."
"Everything needs more Dakka, including the Dakka..."