Lego doodles POST THEM
Moderators: Dr. X, ikensall, fredde
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
It's not about winning Colette. As long as it seems like a worthwhile pastime and you're learning something, it's worth it. Although I guess it's kinda silly we're theorizing about something that will (hopefully) never happen.
When you see people arguing about their favourite sports team, then don't hesitate to use that picture.
When you see people arguing about their favourite sports team, then don't hesitate to use that picture.
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
This is unrelated to the argument, but Zahru's post reminded me of some other copyright stuff I wanted to point out.
Stuff like the AC instructions are automatically subject to copyright; that's the kind of thing copyright is designed for. But for the MOC itself, what can and can't be copyrighted isn't necessarily so clear.
Luckily we have the history of LEGO sets to draw from. LEGO designs can be copyrighted, because otherwise Mega Bloks and everyone else would be making duplicates of the exact same sets. They tried it in the eighties, but got struck down, even after they removed all the obvious identifying trademarks (replacing the space logo with a mega bloks logo, etc.). LEGO designs can be copyrighted even when the functionality and design of the LEGO brick (minus the LEGO logo on the studs) can't.
For the AC in particular, you would have a very hard time getting a copyright for the AC itself, because obviously somebody else owns the copyright (and probably even a trademark) on the Armored Core franchise. As such the people selling the MOC instructions absolutely, definitely have no legal right to do so. Whether or not they can claim copyrights on the building techniques or design instructions when they're in flagrant copyright violation themselves, well ... I'm not sure how that works actually. I'll be out drinking with the lawyers again tomorrow, so I guess I could ask if anyone's interested, but it's kind of obscure.
Stuff like the AC instructions are automatically subject to copyright; that's the kind of thing copyright is designed for. But for the MOC itself, what can and can't be copyrighted isn't necessarily so clear.
Luckily we have the history of LEGO sets to draw from. LEGO designs can be copyrighted, because otherwise Mega Bloks and everyone else would be making duplicates of the exact same sets. They tried it in the eighties, but got struck down, even after they removed all the obvious identifying trademarks (replacing the space logo with a mega bloks logo, etc.). LEGO designs can be copyrighted even when the functionality and design of the LEGO brick (minus the LEGO logo on the studs) can't.
For the AC in particular, you would have a very hard time getting a copyright for the AC itself, because obviously somebody else owns the copyright (and probably even a trademark) on the Armored Core franchise. As such the people selling the MOC instructions absolutely, definitely have no legal right to do so. Whether or not they can claim copyrights on the building techniques or design instructions when they're in flagrant copyright violation themselves, well ... I'm not sure how that works actually. I'll be out drinking with the lawyers again tomorrow, so I guess I could ask if anyone's interested, but it's kind of obscure.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
I think we can at least agree it's not an easy, wholly transparent subject.
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
It's a lot more transparent than it used to be though; every time the Lego legal department concludes a case (whether they win or lose), it's another precedent set and one more question that we don't need to answer anymore.
So I forget what we were trying to answer in the first place, other than whether or not it's ethical that the AC guys charged money for their MOC instructions, but the very basic question of whether a MOC design can have copyright protection is pretty clear.
So I forget what we were trying to answer in the first place, other than whether or not it's ethical that the AC guys charged money for their MOC instructions, but the very basic question of whether a MOC design can have copyright protection is pretty clear.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
Wait, now I see Zahru's (non-AC) post that you were talking about. Yes, I was thinking about the wrong post.Zahru II wrote:So if I rebuild something via pictures of a MOC, am I infringing 'copyright'?
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
Yes, I never tried to argue with that, all I'm saying is that it could be difficult to get it / prove you deserve it considering (aforementioned reasons) in cases where the defendant's MOC isn't an exact replica. I'm also considering that most MOCs aren't built completely from scratch and have ideas (the concept of an AC, power armor, etc. might already belong to someone somewhere) and often even other MOCs preceding them. It's even possible to have an idea you think is your own, simply because you don't remember you saw it somewhere else the first time, but it's still in your mind.the very basic question of whether a MOC design can have copyright protection is pretty clear.
Last edited by Bragallot on Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
I decided to google around about this, and lol: http://articles.courant.com/2012-01-29/ ... -toys-lock
I like Best-Lock so much better now.Geller, who runs Hong Kong-based Best-Lock from the west coast of Canada, said he decided to become a LEGO competitor in part because he thought it was unethical that the Danish firm copied the British bricks invented by Hilary Page.
In an interview Friday, he acknowledged the similarities between the shapes of Best-Lock's figures and LEGO's.
"I did the figures because I want to piss them off," he said.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
Well at least he's honest.
Having read the article though, it seems he plays mostly on the emotional side of things ('Lego was too expensive for me as a kid, blabla') and that doesn't tend to impress judges, at least it shouldn't. Personally I don't mind there being cloan brands to keep Lego sharp though.
Having read the article though, it seems he plays mostly on the emotional side of things ('Lego was too expensive for me as a kid, blabla') and that doesn't tend to impress judges, at least it shouldn't. Personally I don't mind there being cloan brands to keep Lego sharp though.
- Keldoclock
- My Little Pony
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:19 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
I think I would amend that to just talking to Brag in general. Not to offend, dude, but you are like, soooooo easily worked up into a fervor. It's like you are doing it on purpose, which, come to think of it, you probably are.Collette
stubby wrote:omg noob, balrogs are maiars too, don't you know anything
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
Hey, I was wondering where you were! It's weird to get Brag whipped up over something and not have you immediately jumping in swinging. Without you there I feel like we just kind of ran out of steam halfway in.Keldoclock wrote:I think I would amend that to just talking to Brag in general. Not to offend, dude, but you are like, soooooo easily worked up into a fervor. It's like you are doing it on purpose, which, come to think of it, you probably are.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
- Bragallot
- MULTIPLE, SIMULTANEOUS AND DEVASTATING DEFENSIVE DEEP STRIKES!!!
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: Medivo
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
Nope. That's just your interpretation. I don't know where you draw this fervor stuff from, because we were just talking.Keldoclock wrote:I think I would amend that to just talking to Brag in general. Not to offend, dude, but you are like, soooooo easily worked up into a fervor. It's like you are doing it on purpose, which, come to think of it, you probably are.Collette
This is the BrikWars forum, and not everyone here plays nice all the time, including you. Occasionally I say controversial stuff on purpose, and I'm not the only one. You probably don't take everything ShadowScythe, Warhead, Silverdream, Magic Soap and Ham say seriously all the time, so you don't have to make an exception for me.
Last edited by Bragallot on Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:52 am, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
Better late than never I guess
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
- IVhorseman
- If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
- Posts: 5293
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
- Location: The Abyss
- Contact:
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
For the past 4 pages. You guys are definitely both boneriffic.Bragallot wrote:Nope. That's just your interpretation. I don't know where you draw this fervor stuff from, because we were just talking.
Warhead wrote:my head burns with War.
Plastik Armory: a bunch of weapons and abilities compatible with the 2010 rules.
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
(honestly I've just been looking for an excuse to make this smiley)
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?
- Quantumsurfer
- Thank god for Kool-Aid™
- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: Lego doodles POST THEM
Yeah, no, the funny thing is that we all just sat here and watched it play out. Who's boneriffic now?