BW 2010 feedback

Rules questions, suggestions, and discussion

Moderators: IVhorseman, Pwnerade

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby The Shadowscythe » Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:14 pm

Damnit, I just realised I have been defeated by autocorrect.

*Fleshlight.
Image

-- WARNINK -- LINK BELOW IZ KNOWN TO CAUZE HEMMORAGE --
Spoiler: show
Image

I WARNED YOU, DIDN'T I WARN YOU?! BLAME RAYHAWK DAMNIT.
User avatar
The Shadowscythe
The Brikwars Trickster God.
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:22 am
Location: Lampeter, Wales

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Whiteagle » Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:45 pm

The Shadowscythe wrote:Damnit, I just realised I have been defeated by autocorrect.

*Fleshlight.

Ah, I figured that's what you were probably suggesting...

...But yeah, you can have SEX with nearly any inanimate object.
It's the pillow talk I want though...
User avatar
Whiteagle
Playmobil
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:30 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Gungnir » Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:12 am

The great thing about sex toys is that you can say anything to them and they'll never get offended. There's no reason you can't pillow talk to a fleshlight.
Give a minifig an inch, and he'll murder for a mile.
User avatar
Gungnir
Jaw-Jaw
 
Posts: 766
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Whiteagle » Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:30 am

Gungnir wrote:The great thing about sex toys is that you can say anything to them and they'll never get offended. There's no reason you can't pillow talk to a fleshlight.

But can you cuddle with one?
User avatar
Whiteagle
Playmobil
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:30 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Silverdream » Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:19 am

That's why you get a bodypillow.
Image

Spoiler: show
mgb519 wrote:Seriously, you are now the first ever forum superhero.


Colette wrote:I hereby acknowledge Silverdream as the one and only forum troll as agreed in the bet.


Quantumsurfer wrote:No, I have 2 silver.
User avatar
Silverdream
Maximus, I'm Dying
 
Posts: 8004
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:33 pm
Location: Feeding my fuckin' habit.

Re:

Postby dilanski » Mon May 12, 2014 4:09 pm

Ever have that weird 'tick' when something completely irrelevant from forever ago comes into your mind, then all of a sudden overrides everything else? Well fuck.

stubby - 2011 wrote:
dilanski wrote:I know it's not important but could Quikwars be made more distanced from the full rule-set, When I first read the 2005 rule-book I ploughed through without realizing that I'd passed the division between the two rule-sets, might just be me but CH1 seemed to be like an extension of QW.

This is a legitimate issue, and I've heard similar complaints from other folks in the past as well. I haven't decided on the best way to address it yet.


The idea; Replace QW with a ruleset that is really dumbed down, but still has all the basics. QW is essentially training wheels, can you get the turn order right, can you roll the right dice, can you not choke on a 2x4 brick. Ch 1 is the wheels off, you get explosives, hero's, a three course meal of awesome. Ch 2 is a full on motorbike, all the trimmings, all the rules, all the awesome.

In the new QW, nothing would go in that directly contradicts Ch 1, but simply makes omissions, or simplifications. This works positively as A) it makes going into the full rules easier, B) Means that even if you miss the start of the full rules, you have no contradictions & C) May be quick to do.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
dilanski
Now with added tractor fetish
 
Posts: 2135
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:41 am
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & Subjugated Ireland

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby *CRAZYHORSE* » Fri May 23, 2014 8:08 pm

I just noticed that under the 2010 rules in chapter 8 a Melee weapon of 2 inches would have a use of 3 while in chapter 3 a two handed weapon has a use of 4.
What's up with that?
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.
User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
My Little Pony
 
Posts: 1758
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Sat May 24, 2014 1:20 am

*CRAZYHORSE* wrote:I just noticed that under the 2010 rules in chapter 8 a Melee weapon of 2 inches would have a use of 3 while in chapter 3 a two handed weapon has a use of 4.
What's up with that?

Two-Handed Weapons tend to be longer than two inches, so I fudged the stats.

Mainly I wanted S,M,L melee weapons to ramp up cleanly to Use:2,3,4.
User avatar
stubby
Psy.D Manchild Psychology, U. of Wikipedia
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby *CRAZYHORSE* » Sat May 24, 2014 9:32 am

Ah, that also explains why it states in the rules that a Heavy with compensating can wield CC weapons up to 3 and 4 inches long.
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.
User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
My Little Pony
 
Posts: 1758
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Sat May 24, 2014 1:47 pm

*CRAZYHORSE* wrote:Ah, that also explains why it states in the rules that a Heavy with compensating can wield CC weapons up to 3 and 4 inches long.

No, that's something else. A Compensating Heavy becomes effectively Size:2", so he can use 4" worth of weapons.
User avatar
stubby
Psy.D Manchild Psychology, U. of Wikipedia
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Gungnir » Sat May 24, 2014 11:12 pm

stubby wrote:No, that's something else. A Compensating Heavy becomes effectively Size:2", so he can use 4" worth of weapons.

As long as he isn't doing anything else.
Give a minifig an inch, and he'll murder for a mile.
User avatar
Gungnir
Jaw-Jaw
 
Posts: 766
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby *CRAZYHORSE* » Mon May 26, 2014 6:34 pm

Ah so a heavy could use a size 3 gun but not a size 4 gun because the hand held weapon size limit is 1,5 times the creations size?
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.
User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
My Little Pony
 
Posts: 1758
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Tue May 27, 2014 12:57 am

Looks like the text on the Heavy card no longer matches the rules in the chapter, that's not good.

The rules used to be that you could only fire a hand-held ranged weapon up to your own size, so Bastard Guns are kind of a fudge, and Heavies only get to fire a 2" gun when compensating. I can't seem to find that rule now though. I would have thought it would be in 8.1, but I don't see it.
User avatar
stubby
Psy.D Manchild Psychology, U. of Wikipedia
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Warhead » Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:38 am

what gets me is that nobody knows or gets that the rules have forever and always been out and in a way released without need for any official release. Mike brought us fudge, we ignore this at the risk of losing our way. keep it simple and fudge!
Image
User avatar
Warhead
Build me an Army worthy of Mordor
 
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: I'm Momnipresent.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Tzan » Sat Jun 07, 2014 11:50 am

Launchers are ideally used to deliver Explosive Payloads, but boulders, plague-ridden corpses, and fully-loaded port-a-potties raining onto enemy formations also have their special charm.


I sure wouldn't want to get hit by a butt boulder.
User avatar
Tzan
Blockguy
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston

PreviousNext

Return to The Rulebook

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests