BW 2010 feedback

Rules questions, suggestions, and discussion

Moderators: Pwnerade, IVhorseman

User avatar
Whiteagle
whiteeagle problems
whiteeagle problems
Posts: 1286
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:30 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by Whiteagle » Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:45 pm

The Shadowscythe wrote:Damnit, I just realised I have been defeated by autocorrect.

*Fleshlight.
Ah, I figured that's what you were probably suggesting...

...But yeah, you can have SEX with nearly any inanimate object.
It's the pillow talk I want though...

User avatar
Gungnir
Jaw-Jaw
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by Gungnir » Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:12 am

The great thing about sex toys is that you can say anything to them and they'll never get offended. There's no reason you can't pillow talk to a fleshlight.
BrikThulhu eats 1d6 minifigs each turn.

User avatar
Whiteagle
whiteeagle problems
whiteeagle problems
Posts: 1286
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:30 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by Whiteagle » Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:30 am

Gungnir wrote:The great thing about sex toys is that you can say anything to them and they'll never get offended. There's no reason you can't pillow talk to a fleshlight.
But can you cuddle with one?

User avatar
Silverdream
Nice use of noise
Posts: 6078
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:33 pm
Location: Sweating like a guy in a basketball manga

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by Silverdream » Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:19 am

That's why you get a bodypillow.
This sig is too fucking large: show anyway
Image lol j/k

User avatar
dilanski
Now with added tractor fetish
Now with added tractor fetish
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:41 am
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & FUCK THE DUP
Contact:

Re:

Post by dilanski » Mon May 12, 2014 4:09 pm

Ever have that weird 'tick' when something completely irrelevant from forever ago comes into your mind, then all of a sudden overrides everything else? Well fuck.
stubby - 2011 wrote:
dilanski wrote:I know it's not important but could Quikwars be made more distanced from the full rule-set, When I first read the 2005 rule-book I ploughed through without realizing that I'd passed the division between the two rule-sets, might just be me but CH1 seemed to be like an extension of QW.
This is a legitimate issue, and I've heard similar complaints from other folks in the past as well. I haven't decided on the best way to address it yet.
The idea; Replace QW with a ruleset that is really dumbed down, but still has all the basics. QW is essentially training wheels, can you get the turn order right, can you roll the right dice, can you not choke on a 2x4 brick. Ch 1 is the wheels off, you get explosives, hero's, a three course meal of awesome. Ch 2 is a full on motorbike, all the trimmings, all the rules, all the awesome.

In the new QW, nothing would go in that directly contradicts Ch 1, but simply makes omissions, or simplifications. This works positively as A) it makes going into the full rules easier, B) Means that even if you miss the start of the full rules, you have no contradictions & C) May be quick to do.
Almond Status: ACTIVATED

User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
Mega Blok
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by *CRAZYHORSE* » Fri May 23, 2014 8:08 pm

I just noticed that under the 2010 rules in chapter 8 a Melee weapon of 2 inches would have a use of 3 while in chapter 3 a two handed weapon has a use of 4.
What's up with that?
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
Posts: 5201
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by stubby » Sat May 24, 2014 1:20 am

*CRAZYHORSE* wrote:I just noticed that under the 2010 rules in chapter 8 a Melee weapon of 2 inches would have a use of 3 while in chapter 3 a two handed weapon has a use of 4.
What's up with that?
Two-Handed Weapons tend to be longer than two inches, so I fudged the stats.

Mainly I wanted S,M,L melee weapons to ramp up cleanly to Use:2,3,4.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?

User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
Mega Blok
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by *CRAZYHORSE* » Sat May 24, 2014 9:32 am

Ah, that also explains why it states in the rules that a Heavy with compensating can wield CC weapons up to 3 and 4 inches long.
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
Posts: 5201
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by stubby » Sat May 24, 2014 1:47 pm

*CRAZYHORSE* wrote:Ah, that also explains why it states in the rules that a Heavy with compensating can wield CC weapons up to 3 and 4 inches long.
No, that's something else. A Compensating Heavy becomes effectively Size:2", so he can use 4" worth of weapons.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?

User avatar
Gungnir
Jaw-Jaw
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by Gungnir » Sat May 24, 2014 11:12 pm

stubby wrote:No, that's something else. A Compensating Heavy becomes effectively Size:2", so he can use 4" worth of weapons.
As long as he isn't doing anything else.
BrikThulhu eats 1d6 minifigs each turn.

User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
Mega Blok
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by *CRAZYHORSE* » Mon May 26, 2014 6:34 pm

Ah so a heavy could use a size 3 gun but not a size 4 gun because the hand held weapon size limit is 1,5 times the creations size?
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
Posts: 5201
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by stubby » Tue May 27, 2014 12:57 am

Looks like the text on the Heavy card no longer matches the rules in the chapter, that's not good.

The rules used to be that you could only fire a hand-held ranged weapon up to your own size, so Bastard Guns are kind of a fudge, and Heavies only get to fire a 2" gun when compensating. I can't seem to find that rule now though. I would have thought it would be in 8.1, but I don't see it.
Natalya wrote:Wtf is going on in this thread?

User avatar
Warhead
kaka pants
Posts: 7299
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: I'm Momnipresent.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by Warhead » Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:38 am

what gets me is that nobody knows or gets that the rules have forever and always been out and in a way released without need for any official release. Mike brought us fudge, we ignore this at the risk of losing our way. keep it simple and fudge!
Image

User avatar
Tzan
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Has anyone ever used those holes before?
Posts: 4799
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by Tzan » Sat Jun 07, 2014 11:50 am

Launchers are ideally used to deliver Explosive Payloads, but boulders, plague-ridden corpses, and fully-loaded port-a-potties raining onto enemy formations also have their special charm.
I sure wouldn't want to get hit by a butt boulder.

User avatar
samuelzz10
n00b
n00b
Posts: 817
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:09 pm
Location: planet express

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Post by samuelzz10 » Sun Jun 22, 2014 8:51 pm

Not sure if it's been brought up a million times, but I think this should be called the 2015 rule book at this point...
Image
Spoiler
Show
my old sig
Image
WARNING: Posts in forum may have been edited by forum

Post Reply