BrikWars 2010: Coming Soon

by **tahthing** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:49 pm

what if a unit moves though a area wheres there fire? like near a explotion or something dose the unit catch fire or dose it just move on.
a example might be where a uber-mega-destruction drone MK390 fires it missile launcer at a tank, the turret blows up and burns, the porthole is open and clear other than the fire burning around it, can a minifiger climb up and shot at the destrution drone or will he catch fire.

by **birdman** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:53 pm

unless he was covered in something that doesn't burn, he would definitely catch on fire.

by **jifel** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:07 pm

Definitely. I just use 1d6 damage for indirect flame attacks (not flamethrowers), but it is your choice.

jifel

by **IVhorseman** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:22 pm

A while back I made comprehensive fire rules.

by **kidko** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:42 pm

He's definitely gonna be walking away a bit toasty.

The rules I try to use are 1d6 every turn until you put out the fire. You could do the stupid-but-possibly-effective school-suggested thing, where the minifig goes prone and then moves 1" to the left & right. Or you could get eaten by Ktulu, who then proceeds to fall back into the ocean. Either way works.

by **tahthing** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:42 pm

those rules are logic based all brik matter can burn.
only anoraks need fireproof stuff.

by **birdman** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:49 pm

kidko wrote:...Ktulu...

you're the first person i've seen who spells cttthhuallaaaaghuue that way.

by **IVhorseman** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:27 pm

birdman wrote:
kidko wrote:...Ktulu...

you're the first person i've seen who spells cttthhuallaaaaghuue that way.

Metallica, son.

by **birdman** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:31 pm

i assumed he was referring to cthulhu, the tentacled elder god.
i know about metallica.

and i'm pretty sure i'm older than you.

by **IVhorseman** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:00 pm

Metallica, son.

by **OneEye589** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:01 pm

birdman wrote:i assumed he was referring to cthulhu, the tentacled elder god.
i know about metallica.

and i'm pretty sure i'm older than you.

Hey, I'm pretty sure my grandparents are older than you and I'm pretty sure they don't know about Metallica.

:-P

by **Niflheim** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:37 pm

The only things that wouldn't catch fire is like magma made armor or something highly fire resistant. Even if it was fire resistant, wouldn't the person still be really hot and start burning somewhat? The only way they wouldn't get fire damage would be:
A): A being made of fire, magma, etc. that would absorb the fire.
or
B): Having a person with fire resistant armor, and a cooling system. though this would probably cost a shit load of CP.

*~*Niflheim*~*

by **Evelgrivion** » Sat Feb 21, 2009 4:10 am

I voted for "catch fire" because it means more chaos and destruction on the battlefield. Above all, isn't that what we play for?

by **kidko** » Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:41 pm

OneEye589 wrote:
birdman wrote:i assumed he was referring to cthulhu, the tentacled elder god.
i know about metallica.

and i'm pretty sure i'm older than you.

Hey, I'm pretty sure my grandparents are older than you and I'm pretty sure they don't know about Metallica.

I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter.

And Ktulu, Cthulu... it doesn't matter. Everybody knows what/who I'm talking about.

BrikWars 2010: Coming Soon

catching fire

will he

catching fire

Who is online