Should flamethrowers be given their own stats?

Supplement ideas, house rules, homemade stat cards, homebrew weapon types, and other cool variations

Moderators: Rev. Sylvanus, warman45

Should flamethrowers have their own stats?

Yes
33
85%
No
6
15%
 
Total votes: 39

tommahoney
Battlefield General
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:52 pm
Location: Blackpool, England

Should flamethrowers be given their own stats?

Post by tommahoney » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:32 pm

Flamethrowers and similar things with a cone of fire stretching from the barrel of the weapon, don't fit into any of the main categories. Of course we can make the stats our selves, but it would be nice to have stats in the big book! What do you think?

User avatar
Elmagnifico
Galidor
Galidor
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Still Controversial to Some Douches
Contact:

Post by Elmagnifico » Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:42 am

B to the U to the M to tha' P

BUMP!!!
READTHEFORUMCODE!!!
Varsaavius wrote:As the size of the explosion increases, the amount of social situations it can't resolve approaches zero.

User avatar
lrdofbricks
Jaw-Jaw
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:35 am
Location: delaWhere?

Post by lrdofbricks » Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:59 am

it depends. some flamethrower cover a large area and those i would give the stats of a minigun, but it sets things on fire. others fire a funneled stream that i would give the stats of a rifle, only it sets things on fire.
Image
LEGION- fear it
the 100000 post- by me
"manliness= X(warhead+piltog)^2/James+burgandy"

User avatar
Warhead
kaka pants
Posts: 7300
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: I'm Momnipresent.

Post by Warhead » Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:53 am

Flamer and Heavy Flamer. Two sets of slightly different stats?
Image

User avatar
IVhorseman
If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
Posts: 5294
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: The Abyss
Contact:

Post by IVhorseman » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:26 am

You can make a flamethrower really easily by just taking a standard weapon like a pistol or a rifle, and instead of doing damage, it lights things on fire, leading to all of the effects associated with being on fire.

User avatar
benkim123
Dimmy
Posts: 696
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:19 am
Location: Inside a Hammerhead Gunship

Post by benkim123 » Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:17 pm

Elmagnifico wrote:B to the U to the M to tha' P

BUMP!!!
:studgod:
Image

LocoJoe
Champion
Champion
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Neck deep in bat-piranhas(the worst kind of piranhas).

Post by LocoJoe » Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:18 pm

Here are some stats that I came up with.
COST: 10cp
RANGE: a cone of a 66 degree angle 10'' long
USE:4
NOTES: do not need to role to see if it hits because flames are everywhere within the cone, if it does enough damage to kill it obliterizes any target within the cone WITHOUT ENEMY RESPONSE.

feel free to criticize.

User avatar
Warhead
kaka pants
Posts: 7300
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: I'm Momnipresent.

Post by Warhead » Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:33 pm

Here are mine as per ZZD.

Flame Pistol/Heat Pistol etc

Flamer

Range: 6"

Use: 3+ to hit the target.

Damage: 2D6 on the first turn, 1D6 on the 2nd if still alive.

Special: Area effect. Roll 1D6/3" radius from target. Everything in the area of this radius and along the line to the flamer are hit on a 4+ for the same effect, damage is rolled separate (or just once for quickness). May set fire to stuff in that area of effect on a 5+ for the same damage.

Heavy Flamer

Range: 10"

Use: 3+ to hit the target.

Damage: 2D6 on the first turn, 1D6 on the 2nd if still alive.

Special: -1 from troopers movement. Area effect. Roll 1D6/2" radius from target. Everything in the area of this radius and along the line to the flamer are hit on a 4+ for the same effect, damage is rolled separate (or just once for quickness).
May set fire to stuff in that area of effect on a 5+ for the same damage.


Mostly this weapon as stated above should only harm lightly armoured and non-armoured units. You want to take out a tank, either combine your flamers or Molotovs or buy a suited better weapon, flamers aren't anti-tank weapons and yes, ok, fire can be used against armour but like all games mechanics you can't get an exact fit with stats.
Image

User avatar
dilanski
Now with added tractor fetish
Now with added tractor fetish
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:41 am
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & FUCK THE DUP
Contact:

Post by dilanski » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:03 pm

There are too many types of Flamethrower

Napalm
>Spray
>Stream
Gas
>Delayed
>Non-Delayed
Chemical
>Acidic/Toxic
>Highly Flammable

I would use all of them in a single match.
Almond Status: ACTIVATED

User avatar
Blitzen
Distinguished Owner of the English Language
Posts: 1727
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:17 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by Blitzen » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:05 pm

LocoJoe wrote:Here are some stats that I came up with.
COST: 10cp
RANGE: a cone of a 66 degree angle 10'' long
USE:4
NOTES: do not need to role to see if it hits because flames are everywhere within the cone, if it does enough damage to kill it obliterizes any target within the cone WITHOUT ENEMY RESPONSE.

feel free to criticize.
:necro:
Image
Often, literally, a pillow fight but may include similar situations like volleyball, particularly when wardrobe is skimpy and the action is bouncy.

User avatar
Warhead
kaka pants
Posts: 7300
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: I'm Momnipresent.

Post by Warhead » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:36 pm

:rule7:
Image

User avatar
Gungnir
Jaw-Jaw
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

Post by Gungnir » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:18 pm

Alternatively:

Flamethrower
Cost: 10 CP
Use: 4
Range: 12"
Damage: D8*
Special: On a successful hit, instead of killing a target, the target is set ablaze. Targets on fire take an extra D8 damage at the beginning of each of their turns.

Basically, if they're hit, they're on fire until it kills them.

User avatar
MicVash
Officer
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:03 pm

Post by MicVash » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:57 pm

I like Warhead's stats the best. The flamer is powerful but not too overrated. I would however lower the range even more to 5" and 8" respectively. 6" and 10" are ranges on normal pistols and rifles and should have a farther range than a flamer, especially with the area effect ability of the flamer. A person with a flamer could still target an enemy beyond 5" or 8" with the extra area effect making his actual range 8" and 10" respectively. It's just a little harder to hit a guy that far. (Use 4 as you stated for area effect.) The 1d6 damaage next turn is a nice touch as well.

As for different types of flamer, this "flamer" weapon type is just a generic term. Simplicity. Just as you can call a "gun" all kinds of different names and have all kinds of ammunition. The point is that this is a weapon with an area effect.

As for cost, this is a two handed minifig weapon with the damage rating of a size two weapon. (Even the normal flamer should be two handed.) Therefore give it the cost of a size 2 weapon and add 1CP for "Flame" ability, just as you would add 1CP for "Explosive" ability. This brings the totals to 7 and 11CP.

@Gungir, too far range and by the way you stated the damage exception it sounds like every single turn until the game ends or the unit dies it will still be on fire. This is not believable as surely someone would stop, drop, and roll at some point, or the flames would die down. Plus if a unit was armored there is no way he'd be on fire constantly.
Image

User avatar
Gungnir
Jaw-Jaw
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

Post by Gungnir » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:42 pm

MicVash wrote:@Gungir, too far range and by the way you stated the damage exception it sounds like every single turn until the game ends or the unit dies it will still be on fire. This is not believable as surely someone would stop, drop, and roll at some point, or the flames would die down. Plus if a unit was armored there is no way he'd be on fire constantly.
That's a quick fix: 6" Range and five-turn limit on being on fire.

User avatar
Warhead
kaka pants
Posts: 7300
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: I'm Momnipresent.

Post by Warhead » Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:33 am

I tend not to quibble over and inch or two for ranges at close range, anything less than 6" is a waist of time. So pistols, shotguns and light SMG's and flamers are all 6" ranged. Most flamethrowers, even back in WWII could travel a fair distance anyway.

Image

Image

Image

I also found this online, thought it looked very cool. I can't understand why he's naked though.

Image

Aaah, now I understand.
Image

Post Reply