BrikWars Forum

by **IVhorseman** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:29 am

My favorite link by far (relax, not pr0n).

by ***CRAZYHORSE*** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:19 am

It said that I didn't got any permision to login.

by **Blitzen** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:40 am

IV, you put the url of the login thingie. By inferring about where that took me, and my knowledge of the meanings of urls, I have garnered that <a href="http://host.matchvillage.com/">this</a> is the location you would have liked to have posted. That site has a lot of broken links, though.

by **IVhorseman** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:13 pm

no, i meant the login page. it's a matchmaking site specifically for married people. i find that hilarious.

by ***CRAZYHORSE*** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:52 pm

That's so stupid why are you married then? because the sex isn't good well then it's your fault because you didn't had sex before you married and I think people should to prevent things like that from happening and you now what your up for.

by **Blitzen** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:29 pm

That's a good point, but most married peoples' sex just dies down after a while. I don't know why they'dn't* do it with each other, though, instead of looking for weird internetos to cyber.

*Double contraction. I'm just that good.

by ***CRAZYHORSE*** » Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:09 pm

What if you would just get married so that you can cheat on your wife! That would be sick!!!!!

by **Blitzen** » Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:10 pm

...

I don't get it. Is that sick in a good way, or sick in a bad way?

by ***CRAZYHORSE*** » Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:14 pm

Sick like a hangover kinda way but hey if hangovers are your things then I don't know what to say.

by **Rayhawk** » Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:36 pm

Blitzen wrote:That's a good point, but most married peoples' sex just dies down after a while. I don't know why they'dn't* do it with each other, though, instead of looking for weird internetos to cyber.

*Double contraction. I'm just that good.

"They'dn't" sounds weird to me, although I've always been a fan of "they'd've," which works exactly the same way. So due to my conflict of interest, I'm not sure how to judge your grammatical submission in this case.

Not everyone gets married for the sex. I figure, as long as everyone in the marriage knows what's going on, why judge. More power to them. It's only when one spouse has to sneak around behind the other one's back that I take a dim view.

by **Moronstudios** » Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:10 am

Rayhawk wrote:
Blitzen wrote:That's a good point, but most married peoples' sex just dies down after a while. I don't know why they'dn't* do it with each other, though, instead of looking for weird internetos to cyber.

*Double contraction. I'm just that good.

"They'dn't" sounds weird to me, although I've always been a fan of "they'd've," which works exactly the same way. So due to my conflict of interest, I'm not sure how to judge your grammatical submission in this case.

Not everyone gets married for the sex. I figure, as long as everyone in the marriage knows what's going on, why judge. More power to them. It's only when one spouse has to sneak around behind the other one's back that I take a dim view.

Do you realise how much They'd've sounds like native.

by ***CRAZYHORSE*** » Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:02 am

I from Holland so maybe it's my fault but how the hell do you pronounce "they'dn't" all I get pronounce when I try to say it is:"theydththththththtththtflrrrrrrrrrup"

by **Blitzen** » Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:55 pm

They'd is like wade, but with a hard th sound.

n't is like the end of didn't, wouldn't, couldn't or shouldn't.

by ***CRAZYHORSE*** » Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:44 pm

I tried it and my mouth gets it now.

BrikWars Forum

History project stop motion

What would you rate it

Who is online