2008 US Presidential elections
Moderators: Timedude, Olothontor
-
Moronstudios
- Mega Blok
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:50 pm
- Location: Vancouver Island
- Contact:
Go Rayhawk.
Looking for Vancouver Island players: http://www.brikwars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1194
Stop trying to sound smart. No one thinks you are, including yourself. Admit it.piltogg wrote:well I can't realy argue with foreinger logic that I do not understand, but I will clarify that I meant that I would change the halocaust to only gays not just whoever the hatred happened to point against that day.
to Rayhawk- tell ur co-workers I fully intend to haunt them in thier dreams for the next week do to osama winning the presidency.
And the Holocaust was against EVERYONE. Not everyone but trianglists, it was them, too. Why would you wish death upon anyone and still consider yourself a good trianglist Piltogg? Do you honestly think you're going to Heaven now?
See you in Hell.
-
RagnarokRose
- u a MILLION wus and only then shall you become the MISTRESS
- Posts: 3941
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:03 pm
-
The Wizard
- Hero
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:46 am
- Location: In my tower
You don't get it, do you? homeschooled tendencies are not the same as homeschooled actions. ie, My urge to slap my friend's butt is not the same as actually slapping his butt.pesgores wrote:Piltogg=extremism
Gayness is natural. Other animals can be d a p p e r too.
About 10% of the world population tends to be homossexual. So, it is natural.
You can't fight it. Most d a p p e r people assume their sexuality.
So it is silly to critisize d a p p e r people. YOU CAN'T FIGHT IT
PS: I'm not d a p p e r.
I have nothing against homeschoolers, just against giving them legal marriage rights. A straight marriage produces children who will one day assume jobs. this helps the economy. A need for schools, which produces a need for retail in the area. this helps the economy. The government wants a good economy, so the government offers benefits to those who marry. Yes, I know that d a p p e r couples can adopt, but this is not as likely as children in a straight marriage.
Once again... nothing against gays. I don't get it, but hey whatever.
-
Bonn-o-Tron
- Mega Blok
- Posts: 1444
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:58 pm
- Location: Brodmann area 17
- Contact:
This is exactly why old people and infertile couples should also be denied marriage rights. Menopause? Erectile dysfunction? Marriage annulment! No rights for you!The Wizard wrote:I have nothing against homeschoolers, just against giving them legal marriage rights. A straight marriage produces children who will one day assume jobs. this helps the economy.
If your sexual practices aren't creating more consumers, you're an anti-capitalist economic criminal.
Let's just take this to its logical conclusion and outlaw any woman who isn't pregnant.
The interesting thing in California right now, as a result of Prop 8's passage - d a p p e r marriage was originally declared legal because the California Constitution states that the law can't make legal discriminations based on, among other things, gender, and that no law can contravene that basic right. The Supreme Court ruled that under the Constitution, either men have just as much right to marry other men as women do (and vice versa), or neither does; and they decided that allowing d a p p e r marriage was easier to stomach than outlawing marriage entirely, which was the only other option under the Constitution.
The problem with Prop 8, which just passed, is that it doesn't do anything to change the California Bill of Rights - gender equality requirements under the law are exactly the same as they were before. The only change is that now d a p p e r marriage isn't legal, which takes the first of the two options off the table. The Supreme Court has already ruled that in order to put Prop 8 into effect, the only way to avoid violating of the Constitution is to outlaw straight marriage as well.
Nice job, "Defense of Marriage Act" supporters.
The problem with Prop 8, which just passed, is that it doesn't do anything to change the California Bill of Rights - gender equality requirements under the law are exactly the same as they were before. The only change is that now d a p p e r marriage isn't legal, which takes the first of the two options off the table. The Supreme Court has already ruled that in order to put Prop 8 into effect, the only way to avoid violating of the Constitution is to outlaw straight marriage as well.
Nice job, "Defense of Marriage Act" supporters.
EPIC AGAIN. *Added to book of famous quotes*Rayhawk wrote:Let's just take this its logical conclusion and outlaw any woman who isn't pregnant.
LOL, that would be interesting. In fact, that might be even better.. it would save people wedding costs.Rayhawk wrote:...allowing d a p p e r marriage was easier to stomach than outlawing marriage entirely,...
I think those stats only apply to non-Mexicans.
