A Question (NOT a Forum-Battle, but related)
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:37 pm
I've a limited number of baseplates (and many of them are, well, either old and broken, or so hilly as to be rendered somewhat useless), and am considering a forum-battle (at some point in the future, if I decide I care, and if my wife takes the dog with her when she visits her family for a week).
What's a good size for, say, a battle featuring ~4 or 5 5-man teams, in the style of a common FPS game (ie, Capture the Flag, King of the Hill, Assault, or some other Halo or Counter-Strike game mode), baseplate-wise?
The most I can manage is likely four full-size baseplates (arranged into a large square, and with futures), with four half-size plates off of each side as a "starting area" or "base."
So, would that be sufficient (just looking around, it seems like it might be)?
Are people too intolerant of no-plate battles to tolerate one of those (where several plates are used for battlefield features, but the whole of the field is not on plates)?
Just some thoughts (if this belongs more elsewhere, I apologize).
What's a good size for, say, a battle featuring ~4 or 5 5-man teams, in the style of a common FPS game (ie, Capture the Flag, King of the Hill, Assault, or some other Halo or Counter-Strike game mode), baseplate-wise?
The most I can manage is likely four full-size baseplates (arranged into a large square, and with futures), with four half-size plates off of each side as a "starting area" or "base."
So, would that be sufficient (just looking around, it seems like it might be)?
Are people too intolerant of no-plate battles to tolerate one of those (where several plates are used for battlefield features, but the whole of the field is not on plates)?
Just some thoughts (if this belongs more elsewhere, I apologize).