Page 1 of 2
[BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:34 pm
by bann154
So i fooled around with some bits and pieces and made up some mechanized infantry. I will probably add them to the immortal armory post but for the sake of the 2016 building contest i shall put them here for now. (The Puma APC is the entry to the 2016 building contest and i didnt want to just show the APC)

Overview

First off we have the standard infantry squad each one has a special weapon (rocket or machinegun) and close combat weapons.

Then we have their commander not sure what to call him any names would be apricated.

Finally we have the Puma APC its armed with two auto cannons a flechette cannon and finally a front mounted flame thrower. More pictures below.

All hatches open it has one for the driver one for a gunner and one for embarking/disembarking.

Crappy interior view. It can hold 5 plus the driver in the hull and one hatch gunner.

Alternately it can remove the gunner hatch and replace it with a double auto cannon turret for extra fire power.
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 9:37 pm
by RedRover
very nice! I personal think you could make this a whole separate force, but adding it to the immortals would be cool too.
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:37 pm
by Lord Terrostar
That gun on the front looks awesome. Fantastic use of a worm-gear piece!
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:03 pm
by bann154
RedRover wrote:very nice! I personal think you could make this a whole separate force, but adding it to the immortals would be cool too.
Ok ill have to see what i can do to make it unique thanks for the feedback!
Lord Terrostar wrote:That gun on the front looks awesome. Fantastic use of a worm-gear piece!
Well the design originally came from Silent-sigfigs immortal spider tank.
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:39 pm
by Valiant
Style -- 5
Substance-- 5
Photography-- 5.5
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 5:15 pm
by Steel_Valkyrie
Proper use of Punctuation: 0
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:21 pm
by ednut
Valiant wrote:Style -- 5
Substance-- 5
Photography-- 5.5
Is it just me or are you giving everyones photography around a 6?
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:26 pm
by Scratch
Style 7
Substance 7
Photography 6
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:40 pm
by Valiant
hatkight wrote:Valiant wrote:Style -- 5
Substance-- 5
Photography-- 5.5
Is it just me or are you giving everyones photography around a 6?
The reason why most of the photography is being given "around a 6" is because, to me, a ten looks like
this or
this.
That's probably due to myself spending more time on Flickr than BrikWars though...
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:24 pm
by RedRover
Ice road truckers
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:24 am
by motorhead fan
Style 6
substance 7
photography 6
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:53 pm
by Quantumsurfer
Final Scores
- Motorhead: 19
- Valiant: 15.5
- Scratch: 20
Total Score: 54.5
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 1:56 am
by ednut
Valiant wrote:hatkight wrote:Valiant wrote:Style -- 5
Substance-- 5
Photography-- 5.5
Is it just me or are you giving everyones photography around a 6?
The reason why most of the photography is being given "around a 6" is because, to me, a ten looks like
this or
this.
That's probably due to myself spending more time on Flickr than BrikWars though...
Ok fair enough even though I do disagree I can see why that would be a ten
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:35 pm
by Valiant
Probably shouldn't judge next time; my standards are too high xD
Re: [BB16] Immortal Empire Mechanized Infantry
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 8:37 pm
by ednut
Valiant wrote:Probably shouldn't judge next time; my standards are too high xD
yep.