The 2,017 Blarney Build
Moderators: Zahru II, Bragallot, Natalya, RedRover
- Quantumsurfer
- Thank god for Kool-Aid™
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
Not sure I see the irony. Sure, we have a few elitists here who like to tell folks what they are and aren't allowed to do but, I mean, most of us just ignore them don't we?
In reference to my further comments, I suppose I could see that, turning around and telling someone to go "read the rules." But, then, it was a suggestion to clear up confusion and they aren't rules at all...just a collection of ideas that can be dismissed out of hand if one so desires.
Maybe in reference to contrarians being contrary to themselves and other contrarians? That would make the most sense, I'd guess.
In reference to my further comments, I suppose I could see that, turning around and telling someone to go "read the rules." But, then, it was a suggestion to clear up confusion and they aren't rules at all...just a collection of ideas that can be dismissed out of hand if one so desires.
Maybe in reference to contrarians being contrary to themselves and other contrarians? That would make the most sense, I'd guess.
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
Oh the irony was all aimed at myself - i corrected a spelling to a misspelling, according to a rule about us not caring to proper spelling or elitist views when I in the same post had expressed such views by correcting in the first place.
I was just trying to be funny at my own expense
I was just trying to be funny at my own expense

Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
submission for drunken madness! Alcohol of choice included!
- Quantumsurfer
- Thank god for Kool-Aid™
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
oicCakeman wrote:I was just trying to be funny at my own expense
I was wondering when someone would get round to doing one of these.RedRover wrote:submission for drunken madness! Alcohol of choice included!
- Vami IV
- blah blah swastikas kkk look how edgy I am
- Posts: 2345
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: ✠1095✠1189✠1209✠1230✠
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
how metal is the kkkTzan wrote:"K" is more metal and brutal.
Metal is the music of the Brikverse.
k = 6 ?

- Captain-Camper
- seriously?
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:17 am
- Location: Here and There Along the Echo
- Contact:
- Quantumsurfer
- Thank god for Kool-Aid™
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
Math errors are so common.
- Tzan
- Has anyone ever used those holes before?
- Posts: 4757
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
So the most evil faction would be:
"Faction 18"
"Faction 18"
- Quantumsurfer
- Thank god for Kool-Aid™
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
Most Evil. But also Dumbest.
- Attachments
-
- Faction 18 Grand DoucheNozzle.lxf
- (16.5 KiB) Downloaded 46 times
- Vami IV
- blah blah swastikas kkk look how edgy I am
- Posts: 2345
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:43 pm
- Location: ✠1095✠1189✠1209✠1230✠
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
Quantumsurfer wrote:Most Evil. But also Dumbest.

Haha, I couldn't not post this. My favorite is the one on the right because that goof looks like the obese women from Dark Souls III
Publisher's edit: I now know that those enemies are called "Cathedral Evangelists" which honestly totally fits the theme here.
- militaryfreak
- Officer
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:49 am
- Location: A Military Base
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
I understand you specified an "original build" is a largely upgraded version of a previously posted build sufficient for entry?
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
I think so!militaryfreak wrote:I understand you specified an "original build" is a largely upgraded version of a previously posted build sufficient for entry?
- Quantumsurfer
- Thank god for Kool-Aid™
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
Yeah, I don't see a problem with that. I think we had one of those last year. Significant changes to your previous build qualifies as a new build in my mind. I'd prefer entries not be reposts of your older material but when I specified "original build," I am instead referring to not copying someone elses MOC. Borrowing ideas is fine, obviously, but not a brick for brick recreation of something you saw on Flickr or whatever.
- Quantumsurfer
- Thank god for Kool-Aid™
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
A little under a week remains.
- AnnoyedZebra
- Somebody make this Zebra's rank.
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:46 am
Re: The 2,017 Blarney Build
Can I have an extension of a few days? I've built something and need to take pics