project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:46 pm
...
Page 1 of 2
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:30 am
This vehicle looks like it would be a powerful adversary, given some improvements on the overall design. The only suggestion I have is to give your troops some more space. As it is, they'll likely have a tough time escaping the cramped compartment, especially in the heat of battle.
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:44 am
Those side sponson machine guns are cute. 
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 3:09 pm
this is good
you haven't yet seen my Winter Edition M10 Tank Destroyer
when you see it, this will still be a
, but mine will be a bigger 
you haven't yet seen my Winter Edition M10 Tank Destroyer
when you see it, this will still be a
, but mine will be a bigger Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:19 pm
...
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:23 pm
...
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:26 pm
...
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:40 pm
Seriously?Azshuran Empire wrote:i was inspired by the russian b.m.p. models when i made this tank http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMP_1
They look more like
of them than any kind of tank I saw!Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 5:05 pm
6. I don't follow.
7. Technically, the BMP is an APC. It's equipped with a smaller cannon than modern tanks. And no, I'm not basing my definition of "tank" off of gun size.
7. Technically, the BMP is an APC. It's equipped with a smaller cannon than modern tanks. And no, I'm not basing my definition of "tank" off of gun size.
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:42 pm
...
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:29 pm
mgb519 wrote:6. I don't follow.
7. Technically, the BMP is an APC. It's equipped with a smaller cannon than modern tanks. And no, I'm not basing my definition of "tank" off of gun size.
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:55 pm
You realize I was talking to legofighter, right? I don't understand how these tanks/APCs qualify as . It seemed like a very stupid way to use such an emoticon.
. It seemed like a very stupid way to use such an emoticon.Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:52 pm
...
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:08 pm
TankSnob reporting, tanks are objects which:
6. Use All-terrain propulsion, usually treads
7. Have main turrets that rotate 360 degrees, usually some kind of high explosive or large armor piercing gun
8. Have a fully enclosed cockpit for the crew
Everything else is an Armored Assault Vehicle of some sort.
6. Use All-terrain propulsion, usually treads
7. Have main turrets that rotate 360 degrees, usually some kind of high explosive or large armor piercing gun
8. Have a fully enclosed cockpit for the crew
Everything else is an Armored Assault Vehicle of some sort.
Re: project "Iron Hammer"
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:39 pm
Or you could proclaim . . .IVhorseman wrote:TankSnob reporting, tanks are objects which:
6. Use All-terrain propulsion, usually treads
7. Have main turrets that rotate 360 degrees, usually some kind of high explosive or large armor piercing gun
8. Have a fully enclosed cockpit for the crew
Everything else is an Armored Assault Vehicle of some sort.
Armour + Gun = Tank,
Everything else? fuck it! . . . or even SKULL fuck it!