The BrikWars Forums

Since not everyone is aware of the offenses that result in automatic bans, I'm listing them here for easy reference.

Stubby automatically bans anyone:

• 6. Trying to make themselves the subject of a thread
  7. Complaining about necros
  8. Quote tunneling
  9. Calling for someone to be banned
  10. Concurring
  11. Complaining about spelling or grammar (except Blitzen)
  12. Posting pictures of dicks (except Tarren)
  13. Being a Piltogg (except piltogg)

Natalya automatically bans anyone:

• 14. Making rape jokes
  15. Shortening "Natalya" inappropriately

The Shadowscythe automatically bans anyone:

• 16. If it would be funny to ban them
  17. For posting shit about other people's builds if the shitposter has never built anything themselves

what if I shortened your name to stub

Overwatch_Elite wrote:what if I shortened your name to stub

That's funny because it's meta. It's also like butts backwards.

I already shorten your name to Ovary, so I might try to get angry just for the sake of hypocrisy.

stubby wrote:

Overwatch_Elite wrote:what if I shortened your name to stub

That's funny because it's meta. It's also like butts backwards.

I already shorten your name to Ovary, so I might try to get angry just for the sake of hypocrisy.

shut up stub

I would like to add an auto ban clause to my own list, just to proove I have some standards -

16. For posting shit about other people's builds if the shit poster has never built anything themselves.

The Shadowscythe wrote:I would like to add an auto ban clause to my own list, just to proove I have some standards -

16. For posting shit about other people's builds if the shit poster has never built anything themselves.

What if the shit is legitimate criticism?

Overwatch_Elite wrote:What if the shit is legitimate criticism?

Legitimate criticism is not shit. Insulting people for their builds without having ever posted something of your own, is shit.

Also, stubby - don't you ban people for concuring with other peoples opinions? Agreeing is fine, concuring - not so much.

Overwatch_Elite wrote:

The Shadowscythe wrote:I would like to add an auto ban clause to my own list, just to proove I have some standards -

16. For posting shit about other people's builds if the shit poster has never built anything themselves.

What if the shit is legitimate criticism?

It's not really legitimate criticism if the shitposter has no credit to begin with, is it.

If there's any merit to the "opinion" he was planning to post, then one of the real forum members will say it before long. But come on. If the shitposter knew anything about building then he'd have already built something.

The Shadowscythe wrote:Also, stubby - don't you ban people for concurring with other peoples opinions? Agreeing is fine, concurring - not so much.

Oh yeah! How could I forget?

stubby wrote:

The Shadowscythe wrote:Also, stubby - don't you ban people for concurring with other peoples opinions? Agreeing is fine, concurring - not so much.

Oh yeah! How could I forget?

I think you should ban yourself for this. I mean I know you were trying to point out the irony, but come on, it would be even funnier if you banned yourself for a day for breaking your own rule. You can also ban me for a day for suggesting you ban someone. Then it would really be funny.

1 day ban for Natalya for asking to ban someone.



Alas, I cannot ban stubby.

Natalya wrote:

stubby wrote:

The Shadowscythe wrote:Also, stubby - don't you ban people for concurring with other peoples opinions? Agreeing is fine, concurring - not so much.

Oh yeah! How could I forget?

I think you should ban yourself for this. I mean I know you were trying to point out the irony, but come on, it would be even funnier if you banned yourself for a day for breaking your own rule. You can also ban me for a day for suggesting you ban someone. Then it would really be funny.

Nice! But I just did that over in the New People thread. I have to wait for the joke cooldown.

Anyway the ban isn't for agreeing, it's for concurring. It's a fine line. A fine, blatantly arbitrary nonsensical line.

I'm glad this is here.

I never knew "sttub" backwards was "butts".

ybbuts

Natalya wrote:Something to add here since it got deleted from Thunderdumb...

Natalya's Law: I de-mod you if you delete all the posts in a forum.
- Clarification 1: I also de-mod you if you merge all the posts in a forum

Dumb and prevents efficient moderation.