Page 1 of 2
Which one?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:39 pm
by SVGK
Which year of rules or mixture of them is best?, by best i mean resulting in the most death and chaos ones, i will be making my own rules for the gaps and things i find boring or silly, and how do i view the 2010 rules?, i want magic and supernatural stuff involved and am looking for easier to grasp rule mixtures (i passed up warhammer 40000 on complexity).
Re: Which one?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:10 pm
by Keldoclock
A combination of

and

, using as much or as little of the existing rules as you want.
Re: Which one?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:32 pm
by Tzan
SVGK wrote: and how do i view the 2010 rules?,
I can't directly tell you, but this heretic has provided a tainted link.
http://www.brikwars.com/forums/viewtopi ... 05#p242900
Re: Which one?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 6:01 pm
by cleanupcrew
SVGK wrote:Which year of rules or mixture of them is best?, by best i mean resulting in the most death and chaos ones, i will be making my own rules for the gaps and things i find boring or silly, and how do i view the 2010 rules?, i want magic and supernatural stuff involved and am looking for easier to grasp rule mixtures (i passed up warhammer 40000 on complexity).
http://brikwars.com/rules/2010/contents.htm
Re: Which one?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:37 pm
by stubby
Re: Which one?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:43 am
by Ben-Jammin
2005 + 2001.
Re: Which one?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:41 am
by SVGK
they seem identical to the 2005 rules to me.
Re: Which one?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:38 am
by Quantumsurfer
They aren't, mate.
Re: Which one?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:54 am
by Tzan
Ben-Jammin wrote:2005 + 2001.
Ok I promise I will use BrikWars 4006.
When is that being released?
Re: Which one?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:56 am
by Quantumsurfer
R. 4,006.
Re: Which one?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:14 pm
by Tzan
So, its being released early, nice!
Re: Which one?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:56 pm
by IVhorseman
SVGK wrote:(i passed up warhammer 40000 on complexity).
Here's your most telling sentence; you probably don't wanna touch 2001. It sounds like you've already got a grasp on 2005, and 2010 isn't *that* much different.
Re: Which one?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:00 pm
by Quantumsurfer
Tzan wrote:So, its being released early, nice!

Re: Which one?
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 8:47 pm
by samuelzz10
If you have to choose a rule book, here's what I use.
First, use 2010 rules for basically everything, but use the 2001 monster damage, special unit, and weapons section if you roll for armor. (I don't, so I just use the highest possible you can get on the die when rolling armor and add +1d6 or so to all weapons) If you want some cool stuff, the ancient tomes of 1998 and 2000 also have some pretty cool special units I think aren't in 2001 or 1998. I also have a huge list of stat cards here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u3wxuy44uytrh ... 20doc.docx (I have even more but they aren't in there)
Re: Which one?
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:27 pm
by IVhorseman
samuelzz10 wrote:I just use the highest possible you can get on the die when rolling armor and add +1d6 or so to all weapons
