Darkstorm wrote:Advancing knowledge is only one way to make the world a better place, and it seems to rarely work due to the ignorance of the general population. When there is a huge scientific breakthrough, it seems to always at first be weaponized for the military, then end up in the hands of the general public to play with, "bettering" the lives of many.
DARPA and the like are our big source of major breakthroughs, sure -- but something close to zero percent of the advancement of knowledge comes through huge breakthroughs. The vast majority of it comes through the plodding incremental progress of guys with a bunch of money paying all the smart kids to figure out how to make money 1% faster.
We discover atomic theory or something once or twice a century, but the work of figuring out how to make cigarettes slightly more addictive, or cheaper to manufacture, or how to skirt health regulations, or ship cartons more efficiently to more markets where health regulations aren't a problem - that advancement of knowledge is happening every day. Like, we are
really good at making cigarettes now. Whoever had the job of advancing that knowledge advanced the
shit out of it.
So I'm not convinced that advancing knowledge automatically betters the lives of humanity as a whole. Because of the way the incentives are set up, right now we're usually advancing the knowledge of how to better the lives of a very few at the expense of the very many.