## Angry at Math

**Moderators:** Blitzen, Almighty Benny, Falk

- Natalya
- Ｉ＇ｖｅ ｔｒｏｌｌｅｄ ｂｅｆｏｒｅ.
**Posts:**4660**Joined:**Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:57 pm**Location:**Atlanta-
**Contact:**

### Angry at Math

Fucking logarithm derivatives.

I know all the log rules. Power, Quotient, Product...

But what they never show you is what to do with shit inside brackets.

ln(x²) ... that's easy you can simplify to 2ln(x) which is just 2/x

But ln(x+3) what the fuck? Why don't they show us rules that cover simple shit like this? So angry.

I know ln(3) is like a bullshit number and the derivative is 0. I know ln(x)'s derivative is 1/x. But like addition of a variable and some other crap inside the brackets why isn't that a rule they teach us?

I go on Google and I get Yahoo Answers but they're always writing shit like dx/du dy blah blah... why can't they just explain the rule to me in english? I am sure it is VERY simple.

"When you see addition inside the log you just do this." You know, easy to understand words. Not 70 symbols they don't use in class.

I know all the log rules. Power, Quotient, Product...

But what they never show you is what to do with shit inside brackets.

ln(x²) ... that's easy you can simplify to 2ln(x) which is just 2/x

But ln(x+3) what the fuck? Why don't they show us rules that cover simple shit like this? So angry.

I know ln(3) is like a bullshit number and the derivative is 0. I know ln(x)'s derivative is 1/x. But like addition of a variable and some other crap inside the brackets why isn't that a rule they teach us?

I go on Google and I get Yahoo Answers but they're always writing shit like dx/du dy blah blah... why can't they just explain the rule to me in english? I am sure it is VERY simple.

"When you see addition inside the log you just do this." You know, easy to understand words. Not 70 symbols they don't use in class.

▲

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

*"Ya gotta remember, Soryu's a brutal thug, ain't got no finesse like Shinji."*- Keldoclock
- My Little Pony
**Posts:**1833**Joined:**Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:19 pm**Location:**New York City

### Re: Angry at Math

You aren't angry at math. You are angry at yourself for not paying attention to high school algebra, or forgetting it.

The simplest form of ln(x+3) is ln(x+3). Log rules only allow you to simplify multiplication and division. If you are doing classwork and see ln(x+3) it's probably part of adding or mulitiplying logs together. If it's outside of that context, then what you should do with ln(x+3) is context-dependent

The simplest form of ln(x+3) is ln(x+3). Log rules only allow you to simplify multiplication and division. If you are doing classwork and see ln(x+3) it's probably part of adding or mulitiplying logs together. If it's outside of that context, then what you should do with ln(x+3) is context-dependent

stubby wrote:omg noob, balrogs are maiars too, don't you know anything

### Re: Angry at Math

What he meant to say was

f(x)=ln(x+3)

f'(x)=1/(x+3)

f(x)=ln(x+3)

f'(x)=1/(x+3)

Tzan wrote:That's what Hitler said,Semaj Nagirrac wrote:Well, I took some land without checking if it was owned by a faction or not. I'm not going to be banned, am I? I can destroy everything if need be.

in 1938.

### Re: Angry at Math

Basically, for problems like this, you have to use the chain rule. See, when you have ln(x+3), you treat the inside like a single variable. It can be rewritten as ln(u) to illustrate this, where u in turn is x+3. When you do that, however, you have to multiply by the derivative of the inside. So you have 1/u=1/(x+3), and then you multiply by the derivative of (x+3). Which it turns out is 1, so it doesn't change anything.

Tzan wrote:That's what Hitler said,Semaj Nagirrac wrote:Well, I took some land without checking if it was owned by a faction or not. I'm not going to be banned, am I? I can destroy everything if need be.

in 1938.

- Natalya
- Ｉ＇ｖｅ ｔｒｏｌｌｅｄ ｂｅｆｏｒｅ.
**Posts:**4660**Joined:**Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:57 pm**Location:**Atlanta-
**Contact:**

### Re: Angry at Math

See I knew it was fucking simple.mgb519 wrote:What he meant to say was

f(x)=ln(x+3)

f'(x)=1/(x+3)

▲

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

*"Ya gotta remember, Soryu's a brutal thug, ain't got no finesse like Shinji."*- Ham
- A 701 error is fine too.
**Posts:**741**Joined:**Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:11 pm**Location:**Wetting my whistle at the watering hole

### Re: Angry at Math

only autists really need calc in the real world

stubby wrote: my floppy penis gets first dibs on it for tradition's sake, but it doesn't seem likely that he'll want to stick around long enough to play.

Wightbagel died for our sins.

- Natalya
- Ｉ＇ｖｅ ｔｒｏｌｌｅｄ ｂｅｆｏｒｅ.
**Posts:**4660**Joined:**Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:57 pm**Location:**Atlanta-
**Contact:**

### Re: Angry at Math

Am I doing this wrong?

▲

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

*"Ya gotta remember, Soryu's a brutal thug, ain't got no finesse like Shinji."*### Re: Angry at Math

When distributing the power, does it affect the coefficient as well?

Other than that, it appears to be OK.

Other than that, it appears to be OK.

"But sharing is caring!"

"No. Sharing is dying."

"No. Sharing is dying."

- Natalya
- Ｉ＇ｖｅ ｔｒｏｌｌｅｄ ｂｅｆｏｒｅ.
**Posts:**4660**Joined:**Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:57 pm**Location:**Atlanta-
**Contact:**

### Re: Angry at Math

Oh shit so like does that mean the right part is (2^½)(x^½) ?

▲

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

*"Ya gotta remember, Soryu's a brutal thug, ain't got no finesse like Shinji."*### Re: Angry at Math

I don't yhink you're allowed to split the root like that since it has a minus between the terms. If there were a * or / inbetween the 4 and 2x then you would be allowed to, but all you can do here to simplify is factor 2, so it's (2)^-0.5 * (2-x)^-0.5

What I do to test if I'm allowed to do an operation is to do it on my calculator without variables. Eg. Do sqrt(4-2) and sqrt(4)-sqrt(2) and see if they are the same (in this case they aren't)

What I do to test if I'm allowed to do an operation is to do it on my calculator without variables. Eg. Do sqrt(4-2) and sqrt(4)-sqrt(2) and see if they are the same (in this case they aren't)

Empire of Luchardsko WIP wiki pageBrikWars 2010 Rules wrote:BrikWars ... stands in pretty direct opposition to many fundamental elements of the LEGO® philosophy, such as "Not Teaching Kids How Funny It Is to Set People on Fire."

### Re: Angry at Math

...Everything said in this post is so high above my clearance level I need to report to a termination booth.

- Kommander Ken
- an avid fan of large round cannons
**Posts:**2110**Joined:**Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:25 am**Location:**Getting Brootalized

### Re: Angry at Math

Makes me glad I'm an art student.

Spoiler

Show

**Armoury:**The Realm of Frostborne , The United Empires of Esduin /

**The Story So Far:**Frostborne Kronicles

- Overwatch_Elite
- In ™ We Trust Overwatch
**Posts:**958**Joined:**Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:31 pm

### Re: Angry at Math

fucking nerds

- Brikguy0410
- Official SEXY Forum Science, History, and Literature Expert
**Posts:**905**Joined:**Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:04 pm**Location:**Rappin' for Jesus-
**Contact:**

### Re: Angry at Math

colette, get in this thread now

### Re: Angry at Math

why are you trying to do things to it? Because I can't picture why you would want to break that up, let alone why it should be possible.

Tzan wrote:That's what Hitler said,Semaj Nagirrac wrote:Well, I took some land without checking if it was owned by a faction or not. I'm not going to be banned, am I? I can destroy everything if need be.

in 1938.