Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
- motorhead fan
- I want to climb on to thevengefulone, stick my tongue into his ear and ride him all the way to satan.
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:17 am
- Location: Rolled up in a ball in a corner, quietly vomiting.
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
I just finished a STD, it probably isn't a STD, and seeing it will probably give you a STD but hey, at least I try.
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
If you share a picture taken from a compatible angle I would like to add your STD to the comparison picture.motorhead fan wrote:I just finished a STD, it probably isn't a STD, and seeing it will probably give you a STD but hey, at least I try.
- motorhead fan
- I want to climb on to thevengefulone, stick my tongue into his ear and ride him all the way to satan.
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:17 am
- Location: Rolled up in a ball in a corner, quietly vomiting.
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
I will do that today(tomorrow)The day after) you get the picture, at some point in the not too far future))
- Tzan
- Has anyone ever used those holes before?
- Posts: 4799
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
You are totally going to get a compiler error.motorhead fan wrote:I will do that today(tomorrow)The day after) you get the picture, at some point in the not too far future))
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
Yes Tzan. Because cameras have compiling facilities.Tzan wrote:You are totally going to get a compiler error.motorhead fan wrote:I will do that today(tomorrow)The day after) you get the picture, at some point in the not too far future))
What Mavericks sig is missing:
Silvawards 2013 wrote: Best Noob
Nominees
-Nimja
-Maverick
Winner: Maverick
- Tzan
- Has anyone ever used those holes before?
- Posts: 4799
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
I meant that he had too many of these ")"
and not enough of these "(".
and not enough of these "(".
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
Oh, I get it now. hah.Tzan wrote:I meant that he had too many of these ")"
and not enough of these "(".
What Mavericks sig is missing:
Silvawards 2013 wrote: Best Noob
Nominees
-Nimja
-Maverick
Winner: Maverick
- Quadruple.Digits
- Nice TRIPS
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
Mind an entry?
Recipient Enforcement Unit (REU) of the Quadrarian Royal Post.18" 16"
I can get a better picture if the background is difficult to work with.
Edit: It seems I over-measured the size. Thankyou Kaplan for the correction.
Recipient Enforcement Unit (REU) of the Quadrarian Royal Post.
I can get a better picture if the background is difficult to work with.
Edit: It seems I over-measured the size. Thankyou Kaplan for the correction.
Last edited by Quadruple.Digits on Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Quantumsurfer wrote:We are brikwarsian moral failures.
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
A white background and a better resolution (larger picture) would be better.Quadruple.Digits wrote:Mind an entry?
http://i.imgur.com/CBcVduR.jpg
Recipient Enforcement Unit (REU) of the Quadrarian Royal Post. 18"
I can get a better picture if the background is difficult to work with.
Your STD seems to be 15'' in size. Only the main body (structure) counts for the size measurement.
The extremeties like claws/weapons are not added to the size. Reference: http://brikwars.com/rules/2010/7.htm
- Quadruple.Digits
- Nice TRIPS
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
After a brief re-measure, turns out it's 16" (there's a bit on the back you can't see from there which is part of the main structure).
What resolution is preferred? That image was scaled down to meet forum recommendations.
I'll see what I can do about a clean background.
ETA: One (1) week.
What resolution is preferred? That image was scaled down to meet forum recommendations.
I'll see what I can do about a clean background.
ETA: One (1) week.
Quantumsurfer wrote:We are brikwarsian moral failures.
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
I will add it when you are ready. You can send the link for a larger pic. Any size larger then 1024x768 would be enough.Quadruple.Digits wrote:After a brief re-measure, turns out it's 16" (there's a bit on the back you can't see from there which is part of the main structure).
What resolution is preferred? That image was scaled down to meet forum recommendations.
I'll see what I can do about a clean background.
ETA: One (1) week.
- Quadruple.Digits
- Nice TRIPS
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
Quantumsurfer wrote:We are brikwarsian moral failures.
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
Royal Quadrarian Post Recipient Enforcement Unit Mk II added to the chart.Quadruple.Digits wrote:Ok, here's Mk. II. 14" (actually)
Feel free to crop it.
- loafofcheese
- Cannon Fodder
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:44 am
- Location: Newcastle, NSW
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
I should really build a super tank.
Only problem with silver bullets is the price of silver.
- Theblackdog
- Pooplord
- Posts: 2689
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:30 pm
- Contact:
Re: Super Tanks Size Comparison Chart
Britannian Conqueror class Land Battleship, 16".