Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == That is a nice picture == | ||
+ | |||
So! that is a nice picture | So! that is a nice picture | ||
− | Yeah, The guy who drew it must be skilled. | + | : Yeah, The guy who drew it must be skilled. -- [[Motorhead Fan]] |
+ | |||
+ | == Battle Reports == | ||
+ | Why are we uploading full battle reports? could we not just link to the thread? -- [[User:Nimja|Nimja]] ([[User talk:Nimja|talk]]) 07:46, 6 March 2015 (MST) | ||
− | + | : 1. old battle reports tend to depreciate as photos disappear and links break from image hosting sites | |
+ | : 2. Battle report threads end up full of off-topic posts and garbage from the viewing audience | ||
+ | : 3. Battle reports contain a wealth of encyclopedia details that need to be crosslinked and integrated into the wiki | ||
+ | : In any case, all battle report pages should contain links back to the original threads. -- [[User:Stubby|Stubby]] ([[User talk:Stubby|talk]]) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (MST) |
Revision as of 19:30, 6 March 2015
That is a nice picture
So! that is a nice picture
- Yeah, The guy who drew it must be skilled. -- Motorhead Fan
Battle Reports
Why are we uploading full battle reports? could we not just link to the thread? -- Nimja (talk) 07:46, 6 March 2015 (MST)
- 1. old battle reports tend to depreciate as photos disappear and links break from image hosting sites
- 2. Battle report threads end up full of off-topic posts and garbage from the viewing audience
- 3. Battle reports contain a wealth of encyclopedia details that need to be crosslinked and integrated into the wiki
- In any case, all battle report pages should contain links back to the original threads. -- Stubby (talk) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (MST)