Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

Latest revision as of 20:14, 6 March 2015

So! that is a nice picture

Yeah, The guy who drew it must be skilled. -- Motorhead Fan

Why are we uploading full battle reports? could we not just link to the thread? -- Nimja (talk) 07:46, 6 March 2015 (MST)

1. old battle reports tend to depreciate as photos disappear and links break from image hosting sites

2. Battle report threads end up full of off-topic posts and garbage from the viewing audience

3. Battle reports contain a wealth of encyclopedia details that need to be crosslinked and integrated into the wiki

In any case, all battle report pages should contain links back to the original threads. -- Stubby (talk) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (MST)

I suppose link rot is a good reason to back it up.--Nimja (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2015 (MST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== That is a nice picture ==
 So! that is a nice picture
-Yeah, The guy who drew it must be skilled.
+: Yeah, The guy who drew it must be skilled. -- [[Motorhead Fan]]
+== Battle Reports ==
+Why are we uploading full battle reports? could we not just link to the thread? -- [[User:Nimja|Nimja]] ([[User talk:Nimja|talk]]) 07:46, 6 March 2015 (MST)
+: 1. old battle reports tend to depreciate as photos disappear and links break from image hosting sites
+: 2. Battle report threads end up full of off-topic posts and garbage from the viewing audience
+: 3. Battle reports contain a wealth of encyclopedia details that need to be crosslinked and integrated into the wiki
+: In any case, all battle report pages should contain links back to the original threads. -- [[User:Stubby|Stubby]] ([[User talk:Stubby|talk]]) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (MST)
-Why are we uploading full battle reports? could we not just link to the thread?--[[User:Nimja|Nimja]] ([[User talk:Nimja|talk]]) 07:46, 6 March 2015 (MST)
+I suppose link rot is a good reason to back it up.--[[User:Nimja|Nimja]] ([[User talk:Nimja|talk]]) 13:14, 6 March 2015 (MST)