Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Battle Reports) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
: 3. Battle reports contain a wealth of encyclopedia details that need to be crosslinked and integrated into the wiki | : 3. Battle reports contain a wealth of encyclopedia details that need to be crosslinked and integrated into the wiki | ||
: In any case, all battle report pages should contain links back to the original threads. -- [[User:Stubby|Stubby]] ([[User talk:Stubby|talk]]) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (MST) | : In any case, all battle report pages should contain links back to the original threads. -- [[User:Stubby|Stubby]] ([[User talk:Stubby|talk]]) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suppose link rot is a good reason to back it up.--[[User:Nimja|Nimja]] ([[User talk:Nimja|talk]]) 13:14, 6 March 2015 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:14, 6 March 2015
That is a nice picture
So! that is a nice picture
- Yeah, The guy who drew it must be skilled. -- Motorhead Fan
Battle Reports
Why are we uploading full battle reports? could we not just link to the thread? -- Nimja (talk) 07:46, 6 March 2015 (MST)
- 1. old battle reports tend to depreciate as photos disappear and links break from image hosting sites
- 2. Battle report threads end up full of off-topic posts and garbage from the viewing audience
- 3. Battle reports contain a wealth of encyclopedia details that need to be crosslinked and integrated into the wiki
- In any case, all battle report pages should contain links back to the original threads. -- Stubby (talk) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (MST)
I suppose link rot is a good reason to back it up.--Nimja (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2015 (MST)
