BW 2010 feedback

Rules questions, suggestions, and discussion

Moderators: Pwnerade, IVhorseman

User avatar
Magic Soap
Playmobil
Posts: 1654
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: 1 Nautical Mile from Imhotep and Lord Scotland
Contact:

Post by Magic Soap » Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:22 am

[Scapegoat = cluelessness]

If this hasn't been suggested already, forum user pictures from the armoury and previous forum battles/reports could be used. These could be used for examples/

User avatar
Blitzen
Distinguished Owner of the English Language
Distinguished Owner of the English Language
Posts: 1727
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:17 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by Blitzen » Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:08 pm

Rayhawk, did you remove the charging example with a the motorcycle guy and the giant? If so, you should probably replace it with a pure shoving example or perhaps a crash. Maybe someone pushes someone else off a tall building.
Often, literally, a pillow fight but may include similar situations like volleyball, particularly when wardrobe is skimpy and the action is bouncy.

User avatar
Warhead
kaka pants
Posts: 7299
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: I'm Momnipresent.

Post by Warhead » Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:01 pm

Agreed.
Image

User avatar
MasterEcabob
Jaw-Jaw
Posts: 837
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: Lurking...

Post by MasterEcabob » Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:10 pm

Honestly I didn't find the Warheadification of the rulebook too bad, as the pictures really work with Stubby's descriptions. It is a bit overboard on the combined fire page, but other than that its just as spread out as the old pictures are.
jifel wrote:"Any fool can make something bigger and more dangerous, but it takes an intelligent man to do the opposite."

As if we care. More explosives!

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
Posts: 5204
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Post by stubby » Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:09 am

Magic Soap wrote:If this hasn't been suggested already, forum user pictures from the armoury and previous forum battles/reports could be used. These could be used for examples/
Silverdream wrote:Death War and the older forum battles have good photos.
If you've got some suggestions in particular, post them over here: http://www.brikwars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4843

I'm not real good about making time to dig through old posts. Also, post a link to the thread or mention who they were from or something, I can't use uncredited stuff.
Blitzen wrote:Rayhawk, did you remove the charging example with a the motorcycle guy and the giant? If so, you should probably replace it with a pure shoving example or perhaps a crash. Maybe someone pushes someone else off a tall building.
The full Charge! rules are moved to the Vehicles chapter, still under construction. The Horse chapter rules are good enough for the motorcycle guy, but the giant needs the full ruleset, so if they're anywhere they'll be in there.

User avatar
Lt. Krus
Dimmy
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:55 pm
Location: Eating mother f*cking bacon.

Post by Lt. Krus » Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:04 pm

Any updates?

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
Posts: 5204
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Post by stubby » Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:28 pm

Sorry, got caught up playing minecraft and launching an MMO. I've been stuck on the Field Hazards section of chapter 8 for about a month now because some of the abstractions I was going to use turned out to have some problems, and now I'm stuck going back to a lot more specific cases than I'd originally wanted to.

mm233
Officer
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:23 pm

Post by mm233 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:00 pm

When do you think you'll get to adding the Weaponry section in Moc Combat?

User avatar
Gungnir
Jaw-Jaw
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

Post by Gungnir » Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:09 pm

It'll get done when it gets done.
BrikThulhu eats 1d6 minifigs each turn.

mm233
Officer
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:23 pm

Post by mm233 » Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:53 am

Ok
But I'm just asking if he knows when it will get added. :?

User avatar
*CRAZYHORSE*
Mega Blok
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Procrasturbating.

Post by *CRAZYHORSE* » Sat Oct 16, 2010 12:01 pm

Gungnir wrote:It'll get done when it gets done.
stubby wrote:You were inb4beluga.

mm233
Officer
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:23 pm

Post by mm233 » Sun Oct 17, 2010 3:59 pm

fine... :(

User avatar
Lt. Krus
Dimmy
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:55 pm
Location: Eating mother f*cking bacon.

Post by Lt. Krus » Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:44 pm

Gungnir wrote:It'll get done when it gets done.

User avatar
BFenix
Pooplord
Posts: 4112
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: City Of Ravens (Lisbon)
Contact:

Post by BFenix » Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:53 pm

Lt. Krus wrote:
Gungnir wrote:It'll get done when it gets done.
I think he gets the point :wink:
Image

User avatar
stubby
tl;dr: the rule of fudge is the entire rulebook
Posts: 5204
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Post by stubby » Sun Oct 17, 2010 7:46 pm

mm233 wrote:When do you think you'll get to adding the Weaponry section in Moc Combat?
It'll get done when it gets done. Right now I'm shooting for August 2010.

Post Reply