Bismarck Troop Carrier

Post by **MasterEcabob** » Mon May 11, 2009 9:38 pm

The Bismarck is a Recihen troop carrier designed alongside the Archibald. While the Bismarck is both smaller and weaker than the Archibald, it does have one key thing the Archibald lacks: speed.

With the Bismarck, Reichen troops can get into the battle zone seconds after the initial bombardment, allowing them to crush the enemy while they are at their weakest.

Although the Bismarck lacks weapons, it still packs some serious armor and is nearly guaranteed to get troops where they need to be regardless of enemy firepower.

The Bismarck has room for a driver and two troops.

See more on Flickr

C&C Welcome!

Post by **Cpl. Halan** » Tue May 12, 2009 5:37 am

uhhh...you do realize how many of those you'd have to make for them to be tactically effective? right?

Post by **james+burgundy** » Tue May 12, 2009 11:07 am

Dang no flicker allowed on school pc's i'll look later (use Brickshelf)

Post by **pesgores** » Tue May 12, 2009 1:33 pm

It is very acceptable.

Post by **Blitzen** » Tue May 12, 2009 2:49 pm

It would be better if the wheels were bigger.

Post by **ahp77** » Tue May 12, 2009 3:38 pm

Cpl. Halan wrote:uhhh...you do realize how many of those you'd have to make for them to be tactically effective? right?

He could put more minifigs on the top of the ehicle.

Post by **Tarren** » Tue May 12, 2009 3:53 pm

ahp77 wrote:
Cpl. Halan wrote:uhhh...you do realize how many of those you'd have to make for them to be tactically effective? right?
He could put more minifigs on the top of the ehicle.

Oh, so they could get shot?

Post by **Arkbrik** » Wed May 13, 2009 4:40 am

my floppy penis wrote:
ahp77 wrote:
Cpl. Halan wrote:uhhh...you do realize how many of those you'd have to make for them to be tactically effective? right?
He could put more minifigs on the top of the ehicle.
Oh, so they could get shot?

No, so they could shoot those shooting at them. Duh.

Post by **pesgores** » Wed May 13, 2009 1:14 pm

Arkbrik wrote:
my floppy penis wrote:
ahp77 wrote:
Cpl. Halan wrote:uhhh...you do realize how many of those you'd have to make for them to be tactically effective? right?
He could put more minifigs on the top of the ehicle.
Oh, so they could get shot?
No, so they could shoot those shooting at them. Duh.

It is small indeed.

Post by **warman45** » Wed May 13, 2009 4:45 pm

i was dissapointed when I saw this because i was expecting something massive and got a walled in ATV. what a waste of an awsome name. but the vehicle is till cool. i would have called it the turtle.

Post by **MasterEcabob** » Wed May 13, 2009 5:48 pm

Hey, I'm going through the alphabet and couldn't think of any other cool names that started with a B.

Post by **lrdofbricks** » Wed May 13, 2009 7:24 pm

hey man, that pretty good. i might give it more armor.

Post by **birdman** » Wed May 13, 2009 7:27 pm

this is like what would happen if a jeep and a zamboni had kids. i would seriously reconsider using this as an APC.

Post by **GoreTaco** » Sat May 16, 2009 12:16 pm

Aw, I expected a jeep with a big curly mustache.

Post by **james+burgundy** » Sat May 16, 2009 2:37 pm

you still got the drivers body?