you....*twitch* have... no... idea...muffinman42 wrote:And anything devided by infinity is always 0.
∀ x ∈ ℝ: x/∞ = 0 ⇔ x ≠ ∞
(might have made a small mistake in that)
∞/∞ is undefined, as it can take the value of any positive real number.
Moderators: Timedude, Olothontor
you....*twitch* have... no... idea...muffinman42 wrote:And anything devided by infinity is always 0.


Nope.Rody wrote:ah, I see, so you view infinity simply as a ridiculously large
No more or less than any abstract concept; the number three is just as much a pure hypothesis as e or i or negative seven or the letter F or the word "and." Doesn't make any of them less specific or less useful.Tuefish wrote:Infinity itself is pure hypothesis, a representation of humanities shortcomings in the area of absolute and specific knowledge.
The grand hotel problem depends on the number of people and the number of hotel rooms matching up to the series of natural numbers, which is a very specific type of infinity. If the people matched up to natural numbers and the hotel rooms were the irrational numbers, then each of the infinity people could have infinity hotel rooms without any trouble at all.muffinman42 wrote:Nope.Rody wrote:ah, I see, so you view infinity simply as a ridiculously large
The pile couldent excise I know but its a meterphor and I don't have to make it to use it in writeing! It's more of a diffrent way of showing the grand hotel idea, instead of rooms its rocks. Lets just leave it to the mathamaticans, because even they are still trying to get it too work.

